Cobb Dumps Balanced Calendar
The Board of Education votes 4-3 to switch to a traditional calendar with school starting Aug. 15.
The Cobb County Board of Education voted 4-3 tonight to switch to its third calendar in three years and start the 2011-12 school year Aug. 15.
That's two weeks later than called for under the balanced calendar the school system implemented this year. The plan had been to test the balanced calendar, which spreads weeklong breaks through the school year and finishes the first semester before the winter vacation in December, for three years.
But with three new members on the seven-member board, Scott Sweeney, Tim Stultz and Kathleen Angelucci, and with a new chairwoman, Alison Bartlett, the board reopened the calendar issue last month and quickly moved to adopt a version of a traditional calendar.
That four-member bloc pushed the board to run an online survey with three calendar options, starting Aug. 1, Aug. 15 or Aug. 17. Overall, 72 percent of the survey participants opted for the balanced calendar, but the board voted 4-3 against sticking with the balanced calendar for the planned three years and 4-3 to adopt the Aug. 15 calendar.
The board later voted to move ahead with the West Cobb ninth-grade academy at Harrison High School, which should open in fall 2013, and to buy the three required parcels of land and hire an architectural firm for the new elementary school in Smyrna.
Scroll down for the best we could do with a wonky Internet connection to report live from the boardroom, which wasn't nearly large enough to hold the crowd. But first, here's a run-down of what the speakers had to say during the comment period. If the speakers identified themselves as teachers, we note it.
Public Comments
Betty Arnold: A teacher, she called on the school board to honor the decision of the previous board, show integrity and stick with the balanced calendar, thus putting students' best interests first. She also said the board offered a choice between a balanced calendar and an arbitrary calendar, not a traditional one. "Going to school on Dec. 23 isn't traditional."
Sandra Riedesel: A teacher as well as a parent of two, she called on the board to "put the public back into public education." She said the people had expressed their will, even if some people considered that expression to be "jacked-up e-mails," drawing a roar of approval from the crowd watching a video monitor in the lobby. That was a reference to Angelucci's comment to Patch last week that the amount of e-mail messages in favor of the balanced calendar had been "jacked up" by the board debate. Riedesel argued that the balanced calendar had played a vital role in cutting teacher absences by 8,700 so far this year, saving roughly half a million dollars.
Marchelle Studstill: A paraprofessional in the school system and a parent, she accused the traditional-calendar proponents on the board of having a "playground-bully mentality" because they refused to listen to the majority or to stand by the previous board's decision. She said she thought the school system had a no-tolerance policy for bullies.
Patty Yohn: The parent of a 10th-grader at Campbell High, she expressed anger at Stultz's comments against the balanced calendar at a public forum the previous night. She backed the balanced calendar and asked the board to take the time to get real feedback from students, parents and teachers and to focus on budget problems instead of calendar issues now.
Gina Ulicny: Noting that she's not a teacher, she pointed to the survey results as a reason to keep the balanced calendar. She noted the drop in the need for substitutes under the balanced calendar. She also warned the traditional-calendar proponents that people don't vote for candidates for one issue and drew laughs when she noted that sometimes they vote for a candidate because no one else is running.
Dave Drabik: The first traditional-calendar supporter to speak, he criticized the anecdotal evidence other speakers had cited to support the balanced calendar. He defied anyone to offer data supporting a balanced calendar anywhere and offered his own anecdotal evidence, pointing to the success of the school systems in Montgomery County, Md., and Fairfax County, Va., which start around Labor Day. After Stultz came under repeated attack from earlier speakers, Drabik took aim at Banks, complaining that Banks had vowed never to change his position on the calendar no matter what the public wanted.
Mike Sansone: He took no sides on the calendar decision but criticized the process as not allowing enough time to gather data and community feedback. He urged the board to table the issue at least until March but, as a last resort, to endorse the balanced calendar.
Beth Phillips: A marketing professional, she praised the board for launching the online survey but said the results of such surveys could be skewed. With a lack of data on which calendar works best, she pointed to irrefutable data: The board has three new members, and they campaigned on a promise to revert to the traditional calendar. "Represent the voters. Follow through on what you said you would do. Come together logically and without emotion and do what’s best for our children" by dropping the balanced calendar.
Catherine Busse: She expressed frustration at the whole debate and urged the board to make a decision tonight, then move on to bigger issues, such as the serious economic challenges facing the school system.
Beth Kriebel: A Ford Elementary School parent in favor of the balanced calendar, she said most Cobb parents had made plans in good faith based on the calendar available for almost a year. She said the public didn't have adequate notice of the possibility of a change, which comes during budget woes and the search for a new superintendent. "It feels like a power play and sneaky politics."
Abby Shiffman: She expressed frustration that the calendar debate had arisen just when the school system should be focused on budget cuts coming from the state. "Let's get over it and move forward."
Karen Hallacy: She echoed the previous comments, urging the board to make a decision and move on so it could focus on the "big elephant" of the budget and academic achievement.
Jerry Bontrager: He argued that the board couldn't ignore the overwhelming majority in favor of the balanced calendar and that doing so would be "arrogant and close-minded." He said of 33 school districts in the Atlanta area, only five start school Aug. 15 or later. He also said narrow majorities can be wrong sometimes, such as the small majority that elected Stultz and the 4-3 majority expected to vote against the balanced calendar.
Dara Fairgrieves: She said it was wrong to raise the calendar issue now because the board had no new data on which to base a decision after less than one year with the balanced calendar. She urged the board to be "factual rather than emotional" and postpone a decision.
Vivian Jackson: In the midst of the state's worst budget crisis ever, she said, the school district couldn't afford to let the experiment of the balanced calendar run its course. She said other school districts had abandoned the balanced calendar and realized millions in savings. "Be less concerned about vacation and more concerned about education."
Amy Ryan: She agreed that the discussion should be about education, not vacation, but she came to the opposite conclusion and endorsed the balanced calendar to set a good example for students and keep them on a consistent schedule.
Melanie Evans: Representing the Professional Association of Georgia Educators, she did not endorse any calendar but did say she thought the issue was settled last year when the school board enacted the balanced calendar. She criticized the rush to inconsistency.
Kara Gold: She expressed disgust that the calendar issue was back, that the board was rejecting the majority preference for the balanced calendar and that teachers' desires were being ignored.
Ed Labra: He broke the string of calendar discussions, speaking instead as a Harrison parent urging the board to move forward with the West Cobb ninth-grade center at the high school.
Lauren Cargile: The freshman-class president at Campbell High, she said she appreciated the importance of democracy and listening to the majority, and all of the students who talked to her wanted the balanced calendar.
Avery Kemp: Another Campbell freshman, she also spoke in favor of the balanced calendar, saying the regular breaks help keep her fresh by giving her chances to catch up on her sleep.
Amy Cargile: Lauren's mom criticize Stultz for not being the schools to see what teachers, staff and students want. She said she's at Campbell all the time as a volunteer and did an informal preference poll that found unanimity among teachers, administrators and staff and near-unanimity among nearly 400 students in favor of the balanced schedule.
Matthew Riedeman: Fresh off a stint as principal for a day at Kennesaw Elementary, the businessman expressed a preference for the balanced calendar but urged the board to base any decision on what's best for the children.
Holli Cash: Stultz's predecessor representing the Smyrna area in Post 2, she signed up to talk about the need to move ahead with the Smyrna elementary school and to criticize the makeup of the board's Facilities and Technology Committee. Closing out the comment period, she said she had nothing to do with the efforts to recall Stultz and was happy being part of the public again. She said she voted for the balanced calendar despite a personal preference for a traditional scheduled, and she warned Stultz to listen to his constituents.
Our Live Blog of the Meeting
9:25: The meeting is over with no further excitement. We'll have a roundup of the comments up, along with photo highlights, later this evening. Given a real Internet connection, it should be by 10:30 or 11. Thanks for playing along at home.
9:20: As mentioned in the comments, the calendar survey has been posted at http://www.cobbk12.org/centraloffice/communications/news/2011/Calendar_Survey_Board_Report.pdf
9:19: The architectural deal also passes unanimously for the Smyrna school. Full speed ahead for that project.
9:15: The board unanimously approves the purchase of the three land parcels needed for the new Smyrna elementary school, then moves on to the architectural services contract.
9:13: Concerns are raised about any environmental issues arise; there's a 60-day approval period. Sweeney asks about comps and appraisals; he's told it's hard to get meaningful appraisals in this commercial real estate market. But the school system is confident in the appraisal.
9:10: On to the land purchase for the Smyrna elementary school.
9:07: The ninth-grade center wins approval to be built at Harrison on a 4-3 vote, with Scott Sweeney proving to be the swing vote in joining Eagle, Banks and Morgan against Bartlett, Stultz and Kathleen Angelucci.
9:01: The center has to go at one of the four high schools in the west or be freestanding, which the board rejected in the past as less efficient. If approved tonight, the center will be ready in fall 2013.
8:57: Chairwoman Alison Bartlett repeats her argument that she thinks the growth isn't in West Cobb north of Macland, so Harrison is the wrong place for the school.
8:55: Eagle makes the motion to move ahead with the acceleration plan to do the ninth-grade center while Harrison goes through its renovations, both with SPLOST III funds. The board is warned that inflation is starting to return, meaning it's now or never to lock in recession-depressed construction prices.
8:53: The $14 million Harrison ninth-grade center is up for discussion now, with the architectural contract on the table.
8:47: If you were hoping for a memo of understanding to send your Cobb children to Fulton charter schools, well, you're out of luck. The motion, made by Stultz, failed 5-2 (Stultz and Morgan are the two).
8:45: Calls of "Recall!" rang through the room when the vote was complete.
8:40: The Aug. 15 calendar is approved 4-3.
8:38: Calendar debate is on. Eagle's motion to table the issue until the three-year period runs out fails 4-3, with Eagle, Banks and Morgan in favor of the motion.
8:25: We'll hear later, but the talk has been that 72 percent voted for the balanced calendar in the online survey.
8:22: Stultz sounds a bit shaken during F&T Committee report, including saying a 7-6 vote to delay the ninth-grade center was 8-7. Lynnda Eagle corrected him; it was 7-6, and one of her appointees who missed the meeting would have made it 7-7. Now discussing Smyrna elementary school.
8:18: The invocation and the Pledge of Allegiance bring us back. Still a while until calendar action.
8:15: Still waiting for the restart. A few folks left, but at least as many poured in from the lobby, where they were watching the video feed and cheering.
8:10: I'll try to catch up on posting the highlights from the speakers, but here are the raw numbers: 13-3 in favor of balanced calendar, with about four others who leaned toward the balanced calendar but were more concerned about making a decision and moving on.
8:05: Ex-board member Holli Cash wraps up the speaker portion. Calls for support for Smyrna. Says she's not behind Stultz recall efforts.
And that's all for comments. Five-minute break.
8:02: A lot of anger at Stultz. Two consecutive Campbell freshmen and a mom attacked him for not listening to the people in the schools.
7:55: We started about 7:27; we have 24 speakers. W're on 17 now. Majority for balanced calendar.
7:20: Did I mention it's SRO? Trying to keep up with one-handed typing. We just recognized the county's top school counselors.
7:17: Working our way through recognitions.
7:14: Serious tech problems, but it's a packed house. A few anti-Tim Stultz signs.
6:50 p.m.: We're live tonight from the Cobb County Board of Education's regular monthly meeting at the Central Office. The hottest topic is whether the Cobb County School District will drop its new balanced calendar, but the agenda also includes the planned elementary school in Smyrna and the proposed ninth-grade academy at Harrison High.
To see the latest updates, you'll need to refresh your browser. Please jump in at any time with comments or questions in the comment box below.
David Chastain
6:52 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
Can you tell if the majority of the audience is parents or CCSD employees?
Catherine
7:13 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
District employees far outnumbered parents.
Vanessa
7:40 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Regarding speakers here is the tally I have:
Parents 17
Both Parents and teachers or employee 2
Teacher1
Unknown/neither 3
Students 2
Other issue 1
But Ms. Busse I understand your frustration with the issue and the board! I am glad that we have teachers and employees that fight so hard for the schools-now if we could only get the board to do the same!
Catherine
11:23 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Hi Vanessa,
You lost me a little on that, I think you are referencing the number of speakers? I think that's a little off, as there were 24 speakers Thurs night, and your count totals 26. The room was full of administrators, principals and teachers. They were recognizing several schools for performance, which I always favor. However, I did arrive early specifically to get a seat and be prepared to sign in to speak. I was barred at the door and told that they were reserving seating for the principals. The calendar has nothing to do with that, but it infuriates me. They are not entitled to priority seating because they are principals. Looks to me like the district was trying to stack the room.
You and I probably have very different views of this issue, Vanessa. Mine is more of a policy and political opinion of the manner in which the previous board voted in the calendar, I really don't care about the dates of the calendar per se. The old board should have never taken a vote to encumber a future board. I believe that was intentional to create controversy for a newly seated board.
Kind Regards,
Catherine
Vanessa
11:34 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Yes Catherine you and I disagree, my point being and sorry I got my numbers wrong, your general comment " district employees far out number parents", might have lead readers to believe parents were not there. You and I know that was not the case, so please do not mislead!
As far as a calendar goes , you are right it was political, a power play. But, please tell me when if ever Cobb County has voted on and or changed a calendar in Febuary for the Next School??
What happens when the board changes again, and they want to change what you believe to be best? I bet you I'll be screaming " foul" at the top of you lungs!! Well so am I.
Vanessa
11:47 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Catherine, please note I mean no disrespect, I know as a parent you fight very hard for what is best for children.
Catherine
12:07 am on Sunday, February 20, 2011
I didn't say we disagreed, I said we have a different views. You are looking at this as a calendar issue and the manner in which it was changed, which is absolutely your right. I am looking at it from the perspective that the old board intentionally made a decision that they knew would encumber the future board- that was the power play. They did not provide any data as to student achievement or costs to operate a balanced calendar. I have always wondered what they were hiding when people were asking about the costs, especially as we knew we would face a significant reduction in revenue and subsequent draw down from the state.
David asked about the composition of the audience. There were more district employees in the room than parents. I mislead nobody, you made that assumption.
As to screaming, I've sat in that board room many, many times and disagreed about what was occurring, and I have never screamed at the top of my lungs. I hope I never behave the way people were behaving the other night. I can only hope that my self respect would take over if I were ever tempted to do so. I am stunned that people are threatening recall against elected officials who kept their campaign promises.
You, and everybody else, are entitled to your opinion.
Catherine
12:09 am on Sunday, February 20, 2011
Thank you for the clarification, Vanessa.
Best,
Catherine
MW
7:01 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
Good question David!
MW
7:07 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
From a working mother's perspective, it is VERY difficult to have a fall break as well as the additional winter break. It is tremendously disruptive to a family's routines. It is extremely difficult to find childcare for such short term work.
Vanessa
10:36 am on Saturday, February 19, 2011
I work full time and go to school full time, Childcare has never been an issue for me. I have great kids with great friend who are always willing to take them and help me out!
You yet to answer me, where do your children go to school again??
TH
7:31 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
I understand that it is hard for working parents but going to school is not daycare.
Sheila Wheeler
8:03 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
Going to school may not be daycare but all the weeks off require daycare for households with two parents working or single parent families.
J Holland
7:34 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
MW-
I couldn't agree more! It's just awful. I find it's hard for my special needs child to get back into the groove after a week off. It takes him about 3 weeks to hit his stride then boom! Another week off! Ridiculous.
J Holland
7:43 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
TH- Of course it's not daycare. The reality is many families have both parents working or are single parent homes. If you are blessed enough to have a stay at home parent in your home, put yourself in the shoes of the working parent for a moment.
CJ
7:47 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
Cannot stand the negative difference I've perceived in the continuity for kids in accelerated programs this year. Too many breaks - this is worse than dozens of in-service short weeks, imho, and anxious to see a return to something reasonable.
Vanessa
10:41 am on Saturday, February 19, 2011
My friend who daughter is in AP classes-loves the added breaks!
It is a matter of preference.
But, do NOT kid yourself in thinking this was about the kids or education.
This was about a self serving agenda and bully-nothing else!
CJ
7:49 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
Also, think there is a political agenda for the balanced calendar - both this survey and the last one sent last year are inherently designed to favor a particular answer by 'splitting the vote' for those who favor a more traditional calendar. Some pick 8/15, some pick 8/17, et voila, a 'majority' select a balanced calendar. How's the conversation going out there, Michael?
Lisa56
12:35 am on Friday, February 18, 2011
•Representative democracy is a form of government founded on the principle of elected individuals representing the people, as opposed to either autocracy or direct democracy.
8/15 or 8/17, the two choices combined would not have surpassed the 70% supporting the balanced schedule. The only political agenda that showed up at tonight's board meeting was a power play by the new board members. What these three don't understand is that their opinions are of little importance. Their votes should represent the opinion of those who elected them.
Recall is not something to be ruled out!
Vanessa
10:45 am on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Kathy Angelucci, who started this mess, made the two calendars, so no, she did not want to split the vote.
Also, only the four who voted FOR the new traditional calendar, vote FOR the survey!
Unfortunately the results were not what they wanted.
Even if you add the August 15 and 17 together, it was not even close to 50% or the majority the Fab Four thought they would receiveM
Michael Stone
7:53 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
Apologies to everyone on sparse updates. There appears to be technical difficulties.
C McNatt
7:55 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
Totally agree with CJ
J Holland
7:58 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
Michael are the speakers CCSD staff or parents?
C McNatt
8:02 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
I'ld like to know who chose the speakers.
Vanessa
10:45 am on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Speakers sign in to speak, they are not chosen
CJ
8:07 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
Agree, C McNatt. We're not exactly uninvolved parents, and I've yet to meet anyone at either school who was not employed by the school system who thinks this year's calendar is an improvement. Who are the speakers and how can they get away without being called on underhanded (surveymonkey???) statistical methodologies and rhetoric?
Vanessa
10:48 am on Saturday, February 19, 2011
I'm a parent at Big Shanty and Kennesaw, yes the calendar is an improvement.
Come meet Kathleen Angelucci on March 8 at North Cobb High School, I believe there might be a parent or two there who feel and believe the balanced calendar is an improvement!
Pam J
3:34 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Vanessa, why is the balanced calendar better? I have a niece and nephew in Cobb schools and they really would like the two extra weeks of summer vacation. I will say that they don't like the fact that they wouldn't have a break in September, but their parents are happy that they don't have to find somebody to watch them that week.
Vanessa
3:56 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
@ PAM, yes the balanced calendar is better for Me , My child care cost have actually gone down, because for me it is easier to find child care ( friends-I have no family here) to watch my kids those weeks off, then during summers. Then again, I plan ahead.
But I think you are missing the point, the calendar is about a preference, you will not make everyone happy.
But, as you stated you do not have children in CCSD,only a niece and nephew. So why the interst??
Pam J
4:36 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Why am I interested? Because I have lived in Cobb County all my life (born in Kennestone Hospital), I pay school taxes and I have family going to school in Cobb County. My belief is that if you pay taxes for something, you have a right to be interested in it. And you are correct - whatever calendar they use, not everybody will be happy. Our elections usually equal out pretty evenly, so half like one thing and half like the other. And I'm sure that most people do plan ahead, although you wouldn't think so after hearing the lady on the news the other night complaining about how so many breaks on the traditional calendar are going to cause her problems. You get more breaks on the balanced calendar.
kennesaw mom
8:08 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
While I understand the working parent issue - I am one - my kids were in much better shape after the September break than they were going into it. It is a long time to Spring Break after Jan.1 and these kids need time to regroup and refocus going into a heavy test prep time period. It's just going to take a few years to get used to it. Cherokee and Paulding parents have done it - surely we can too.
J Holland
8:28 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
I feel it's not a matter if we "can" it's why?
According to the 2009-10 rankings of elementary schools in Georgia by CRCT scores, 12 Cobb county schools ranked in the top 50. Zero from Cherokee. Zero from Paulding. Why model our calendar after theirs? If it's not broke, don't fix it.
Lisa56
12:46 am on Friday, February 18, 2011
Following J Holland's comment "if it's not broke, don't fix it". As a matter of fact it wasn't broken. The balanced calendar was met with enthusiasm by parents, teachers, and community members. This issue was voted on and passed on Nov. 11, 2009. The balanced calendar was in effect prior to the election of the three new board members. There should never have been a second vote. Will every issue that was discussed and voted on prior to Jan. 2011 have to be brought to a vote again?
As for the 12 Cobb County schools ranked in the top 50... to what top 50 do you refer? The top 50 serving the best lunches? The top 50 with the largest student population? The top 50 with the most attractive teachers? It's only an accurate comparison when apples are compared to apples. The demographics of both Cherokee County and Paulding County when compared with the twelve Cobb County schools are undoubtably quite different.
MW
8:14 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
CJ - you are exactly right. If you add the 8/15 start voters and the 8/17 start voters (AKA the ones opposed to this balanced school year)....they actually have the majority of votes.
It's time for some new blood in these positions. Vote them out!! This boils my blood to no end. They are not taking into account the child's best interest. Do they not know that children THRIVE with routines? Too many interruptions of the school year keep children LESS focused.
Vanessa
10:49 am on Saturday, February 19, 2011
MW, only you can add 10 and 17 together to get the majority. You might want to check your calculator.
Pam J
3:37 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
MW - if you look at the 8/15 and 8/17 calendars, there are less breaks than the 8/1 calendar. So I'm not sure where your theory on too many interruptions of the school year is coming from. Once again, I don't think anybody is looking at the calendars.
MW
8:16 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
And to TH - who said school was daycare?! I'm actually concerned that interrupting their school year with more breaks is a bad thing for their education. The fact that employed parents have to then be penalized financially for hiring care for the 2 extra weeks should mean nothing right?!
Lisa56
12:53 am on Friday, February 18, 2011
No additional day care is necessary, it is merely needed at different times of the year. The students are in school the same number of days using the balanced calendar as they would be on either of the other two options. The math is not difficult. Well, maybe it is for some of you.
I'm curious as to what results CJ has used to determine that the 8/15 and 8/17 votes combined make up 51%. I have studied the results of the survey and no where can I find numbers that add up to 51% in favor of changing the balanced calendar.
Michael Jacobs
8:16 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
I'd say at least half the speakers were school employees.
heather
8:20 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
Cobb county - if they want a balance school year then go to school all year around. Stop this madness - either do it 100percent or not at all
West Cobb Mom
8:20 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
I am a working parent and the mother of 2 children with learning disabilities. I am in favor of the balanced calendar as are the majority of the parents I know. I think they should give it the full 3 years that was originally planned, then evaluate the results. And in answer to the questions about who chose the speakers, if you've ever been to a CCSD board meeting you'd know that people sign in to speak on a first come, first served basis.
J Holland
8:33 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
Every special education teacher I've spoke to think the constant breaks throw the children off.
C McNatt
8:41 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
I don't know how you can say "the majority of the parents" when most of the parents I've talked to are against it.
Vanessa
10:53 am on Saturday, February 19, 2011
C Matt- I will ask you the same question I asked MW-what school do you children attend?? Because, I enjoy when people say they have never meet a parent who likes the balanced calendar, yet they never say the name if their school.????
E
8:26 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
I like the new calendar because the kids are more rested and they don't get sick as often. When they tell me that they are tired of school and homework I can tell them that it's going to be just one or two more weeks and they'll have a break. I understand working parents' point of view but if summer vacation will be longer you'll still have to arrange some care for your children and I think the amount of days off evens out anyway. Another thing that I like about this schedule is that if you go on vacation in September it is a lot cheaper than in the summer season
J Holland
8:39 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
Camps are much less expensive over the summer. Many parents have neighborhood
childcare share groups, where each parent has their day with a group of children while their parent works.
Lisa56
12:58 am on Friday, February 18, 2011
The majority of parents are those who voted for the balanced calendar as evidenced in the survey voting results. It doesn't matter who anyone talked to or to how many they talked. The issue is that the opinions of the people were ignored by their representatives. This is the type of government that has recently seen protest and upheaval. The scale of the protest in Cobb County will be smaller but it will be heard and those representatives who failed their constituents will hear them roar.
Vanessa
10:53 am on Saturday, February 19, 2011
E-same here!
Michael Jacobs
8:29 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
The freshman class president at Campbell made the same point, Eva, about the balanced calendar keeping the kids better rested.
CJ
8:30 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
Results of survey are online at cobb.k12.org currently. The data's a little dirty (bunch of oddnesses around things like people being teachers/employees and students both), but at a quick review, it does look like even if adding the later date votes together, there are more who voted for balanced. I don't give much credence to surveys of this variety (and wouldn't if the results ran the opposite direction either), but certainly the balanced calendar folks at the very least got the vote out well.
Vanessa
11:33 am on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Do you give credence to people who took time to email the board. Go to COBBk12.org and watch Jerry Bontrager present the emails to Tim Stultz.
Again, the emails ran 70% for a balanced calendar against the 30% traditional.
It is interesting that the 70% keeps coming into play-yet you still believe it is a made up number?
CJ
12:00 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
I absoluely believe people emailed, and I even said that the data is a bit dirty but that they certainly got the vote out well. However, I will point out that when I downloaded the data and calculated the totals (which was difficult because the data is not clean), I got a high of just over 68% for balanced. That's pretty close to 70, though.
That said, the lack of credence (which does not mean belief, but *credit* or *worth*) I speak of is in the value of a survey conducted in this manner, the methodology of the survey, and whether or not a board ought to utilize it as the sole basis for a decision. Not credence in the number 70 (or any other number).
CJ
8:31 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
Here's a link: http://www.cobbk12.org/centraloffice/communications/news/2011/CalSurvey_RawResponses.xlsx
Vanessa
12:36 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
CJ I think we agree more then disagree. I just find it interesting that the one who voted for the survey ( Angelucci, Stultz, Sweeny, Bartlettand Morgan), 4 out of 5 dismissed the results.
Had the results shown what they were looking for- they would have said the have the majority of community is behind this decision, instead it back fired on them-and I believe it will continue to back fire on them.
CJ
8:45 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
Wow. Now, more about Smyrna and splost...
kennesaw mom
8:48 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
Just remember CCSD - Teachers have a lot of voting power - good luck getting reelected.
TH
8:48 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
My comment was that working parents are complaining about childcare. I think that the debate is on education and what is best for the children not what is best for childcare. The children and teachers are rested after the break. A good teacher can quickly pick up from the break and learning immediately continues.
J Holland
8:52 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
Maybe a good teacher can, but not all students can. Again- why model our calendar after Paulding and Cherokee? Cobb County schools CRCT test score had 12 in the top 50 (elementary) while they had ZERO.
It's not about childcare. Beat a new drum.
kennesaw mom
9:00 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
So the children in Cobb County will get stupider (like your implied comment about Cherokee)? I am sure the Paulding and Cherokee parents appreciate that. Nice.
The ones beating the childcare drums are the ones supporting the traditional calendar. I am focused on increasing my children's performance and it is a bit premature to say a Balanced Calendar didn't work in Cobb when it was never given a chance to prove or disprove. The children stay the same folks. Either they can pass the CRCT or they can't. Let's give Cobb kids a little credit and try the balanced calendar. Oh wait. We are too reactionary to try anything new. Way to be progressive.
Michael Jacobs
8:52 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
Lynnda Eagle made the point that there's nothing to stop the board from reversing itself again in four months or next year, so it's possible this issue won't go away. But it's also hard to see any of the four votes against the balanced calendar changing their minds.
Wendy
9:06 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
Surveymonkey let's you filter responses. I'd be curious to see if teachers/employees were filtered out what the percentages would be. All the parents I've spoken to were not in favor of thee balanced calendar.
I'm glad it was voted down, especially after the possibility of the 8/15 or 8/17 splitting the anti-balanced calendar vote.
Lisa56
9:03 am on Friday, February 18, 2011
Why should teachers/employees be filtered out of a survey that involves them? Just what are you afraid of, change or teachers? Unless you spoke to everyone who voted your argument holds no weight.
Vanessa
10:58 am on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Again, I asked , where do you children go to school??
I love when they state " I never met a parent" yet do not state their school.
kennesaw mom
9:12 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
All the parents I've spoken to were in favor of the balanced calendar - I am not sure what that argument gets you. Depends on your circle of peers I guess.
J Holland
9:15 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
Nope. Facts are facts. Paulding and Cherokee are not leading the way. Cobb has led the way, and that's why Cobb students and teachers have the reputation they do. I don't understand why the board would choose to change something that has worked for years. Why try to prove a new calendar works when the old one worked just fine?
I am also focused on my child's performance. He struggles after every break, as do many of his peers. Maryland is ranked as having the best public schools in the nation. They start August 30, have a thanksgiving break, winter break (dec/jan) and spring break.
Lisa56
1:07 am on Friday, February 18, 2011
Your argument for not changing something that has been in effect for years is ridiculous. I'm sure there were people in the south during the mid-19th century who saw no need to end slavery. For them, it had worked just fine for years. For slaves, it didn't work at all, ever.
I have lived here for 23 years. I have accepted the things that are different in Georgia from the state where I had lived for 30 years. Maryland schools may well be ranked among the best in the nation but it is not because of their calendar. Students in Maryland attend school for the number of days required by the federal and state education departments. Just as the students in Cobb County, Georgia do. As Lewis Grizzard used to say "Delta is ready when you are."
Vanessa
11:37 am on Saturday, February 19, 2011
If the board presented data- the there would be no arguments. but instead, it was a political power pay-nothing else.
Also, if Kathleen Angelucci, Tim Stultz and Scott Sweeny had so much data, that the traditional calendar was better, why did they not present it?
Simple- they did not care what data showed.
CJ
9:16 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
@kennesaw mom -- while I certainly agree that politics are moving things here more than data or "votes", I cannot agree that balanced calendaring concepts are accurately labeled 'progressive,' even here in Georgia, East Cobb, home of the 'evolution' stickers.
Studies (with statistically valid methodologies!) of three year implementations of balanced calendar systems have been tried as early as 1986 here in Georgia, and the results of those attempts are out there to be reviewed. Of the six (not all conducted in GA) that I have read, all indicated that there was no statistically significant difference, but some qualitative negatives and positives were observed in some of the implementations. Moreover, the balanced calendar options being considered (last year - there was only one option presented this year) are in fact closer to a "year round" calendar than a "balanced" calendar -- except that these options were missing some of the key features that large school systems have found provide some actual benefits to students (longer breaks, longer stretches, generally). And while this vote gets me what *I* think is best for *my* children educationally and developmentally, I won't pretend that I think what's right for my family is what's right for the statistical majority of our student population. Instead, I will state my opinion that this year, and the overall balanced approaches proposed were poorly researched and poorly implemented all around.
Lisa56
1:22 am on Friday, February 18, 2011
I am unable to follow the previous comment. I think that CJ is saying that his vote should not be counted because he doesn't know what's best for the majority of Cobb County students. That's why there was a survey CJ. None of the three new board members are educators, statisticians, or academic research experts. If I am reading CJ's comment properly only board members with the appropriate professional backgrounds should vote on board policy. The implementation of the balanced calendar that was approved for the school years Fall 2010 - Spring 2013 can never be researched due to the political power play brought about by the second vote. Let's hope that Lynda Crowder-Eagle, David Banks, and David Morgan continue the good fight.
Vanessa
11:42 am on Saturday, February 19, 2011
I'm confused also.
You believe that the traditional is more beneficial for you family, I understand that.
There are positive and negatives for all calendars. ok
You state their were some key features that were missing that large schools factually find beneficial?
Can you elaborate with the links of the school systems you study?
Thanks
CJ
12:02 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Vanessa, I spent hours doing research. I gave a summary link with a bibiliography below. I have not mentioned the specific school system that I *was employed by for several years* here because there's no reason to drag them in there. Please by all means, do your own research, just as I expect our board members to have done. I have nothing to fear from your doing so and have provided a starting point.
Kim
10:03 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
I know not ONE single parent in my neighborhood, clubs, sports or church who did not support the balanced schedule. We all work, and have children in activities; PLEASE do not assume what all working families want, because it working great for this one!! Of course we don't use our school as free public daycare.
I do not work for the school system and neither does my husband, but who in the world made the comment that Cobb schools lead the way...well that will be tough to continue when so many of you seem to think what the teachers want doesn't matter. Bye Bye quality teachers!! They can teach someplace that treats them and their opinions with respect. Working for CCSD is not a gift, a good teacher is all that stands between your child and the food stamp line someday!! This is exactly the attitude that keeps Georgia at the bottom in education...but they all get free daycare!!
J Holland
10:18 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
Look at the stats. Cobb leads the way in elementary 2009-2010 CRCT results . Why will that be hard to continue if they return the calendar to the way it was in 2009-2010 when the data was collected?
And it is not free daycare. AGAIN. It is not free daycare. The daycare arguement is the last of many that my children and family face. I'm glad the new schedule is working for your family. My special education child (started at 3) struggles terribly after each break.
Again I ask, why are we not modeling our calendar after the most successful schools in the nation?
Vanessa
11:52 am on Saturday, February 19, 2011
San Diego has year round school. Their scores are much higher than ours.
Again, we are upset because the decision was made before proper DATA could be analyzed.
@ J Holland- if our score go up for the 2010-2011, will you still hold your beliefs?
What if it goes up for 2010-2011, and drops significantly for 2011-2012 , will you still believe change is not good.
I know if it was proven that board made the decision in good faith, because the scores were declining ( all results are not in yets-so through that reason out the door), it will save significant amount of money ( have they present or worked on the budget yet?)
then I would changed my mind.
I am not for one calendar or another, wha tI want is board who lives up to the District Expectation of
"The Cobb County School (District) acknowledges that effective district reaches its full potential only when it knows and meets the needs of students and operates based on a mission and vision, supported by meaningful, concrete goals, DEVELOPED BY AND SHARED by it STAKEHOLDES"
CJ
12:03 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Several California implementations of year-round school are quite functional. However, the options being considered here do NOT look very much like the successful year-round implementations. It's apples and oranges, at best.
CJ
10:19 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
@Kim: nice to meet you. Working family, no afilliation with the district, actively engaged in the surrounding community & religious institution and non-profit endeavors, with two children in two different schools in CCSD. Have been in the private professional (read: better paid) sector for more than 15 years, but straight out of college, I put my time in as a teacher and was driven off by 'the system'. I'm adamantly opposed to the implementation options offered by CCSD for 'balanced calendars' and at least briefly contemplated whether I could get the kids out following last year's decision. I'm not entirely comfortable with the way this has all fallen out, but I'm convinced that this is a better path for at least my family. And, until tonight, I hadn't met a single person in my little corner of the world who thought balanced calendars were a good idea, including quite a few individuals who I have been *grateful* to have teach my own children. I have, however, participated in *many* conversations about less disruptive ways to improve our schools that will never be considered here. Thought those 'watching' might like to know that there really are many different points of view out here... Having watched this all come down tonight, I regret that I didn't make the time to participate more fully to get the voice and votes out for my side -- it's a probably unfortunate political fluke that led where I preferred to be in the first place, and that's a whole other shame.
SMC
10:37 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
Thank you for providing the BOE meeting updates this evening. I really enjoyed following along & glad to have found your website.
Kim
10:42 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
Since I may not have been clear, IF you are basing your child's school days/weeks around your work schedule then it IS public daycare; you are expecting the school to watch your child while you work...that is daycare. I certainly DO understand having a special needs child and when the public school system no longer met his needs, or ours, he was moved. My oldest son left a quality public school in the 6th grade (Lost Mountain MS) and attended private school because it better met his needs at that time. All these years later we decided to give public school a shot, but it's not the teachers that drive you away it's the "system". When you send your child to private school you pay them (which public school seems to forget works the same way) and they have to look you in the eye for every decision. They know perfectly well if they make bad choices you, and your money, can go someplace else...of course people on the CCSB know the exact opposite is true, so they do whatever they please and if 99.7% of families wanted that calendar they'd still vote against it and dare you to do something!
BTW we have a wonderful school and excellent teachers who have expressed their love for this schedule and if for no other reason I'm for it!.
Bill Farnsworth
10:43 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
Education is not about "if it aint broke don't fix it" We should always tweak the process to get the best overall results. How can we know if this calendar works or not if we don't complete it first. Instead of comparing CRCT scores to other counties, we should compare CRCT scores using both calendar styles.
J Holland
10:53 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
No, you should compare it to the counties scoring the highest. Numbers don't lie.
J Holland
10:49 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
So if you work while your child is in school you're bringing your child to daycare and not to school? You assume the working parent who falls under this doesn't care about their children's education but only "somebody to watch my kid so I can pay the bills?"
Correct me if I'm wrong. That's the assumption you're putting out there.
Every parent who works is basing their work schedule around their child's. The only time I CAN work is when they are in school. That doesn't mean I don't care about their education, as you are implying. Because you know, working parents just don't care.
CJ
11:04 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
If it's failed to produce results elsewhere (including elsewhere in Georgia) in implementation after implementation over the last 25 years, Bill, I don't understand why we need to 'try' it here - the facts of implementation in plenty of other places besides Cobb County prove quite adequately that there is little to no benefit (statistically) educationally to a shift away from a traditional calendar. There are some benefits fiscally in very large distrcts, where balancing allows for processing a higher number of children through a smaller number of physical facilities (where I did my student teaching - not a place I'd want my kids attending), but those do not apply in Cobb. There are several districts where it's been tried in GA; the earliest I found was in 1986 and for the same three years proposed originally in Cobb. The *best* result sets showed no statistically significant benefit with some minor deviations in straight line numbers to the benefit of trad calendaring vs balanced. I certainly agree that schools and educators (and parents) should constantly strive for improvement no matter how 'good' things are in the first place. But I cannot agree that the feelings (even overwhelming) of any one constituent group (parents, teachers, students, administrators,whatever) are a good basis for diving into "improvements" without adequate research and evaluation by those we entrust with decision-making. And that is what I believe happened last year, corrected tonight.
Lisa56
1:38 am on Friday, February 18, 2011
I do not agree that parents, teachers, students, and administrators should be considered as one constituent group. If you make that supposition who would you include among the members of another constituent group, Allison Bartlett, Tim Stultz, Kathleen Angelucci and Scott Sweeney? Those numbers seem somewhat skewed and yet the constituent gang of four have won this round. The fight is not over!
CJ
9:47 am on Friday, February 18, 2011
I did not say that I considered them all one group. I said that any one group's feelings are not a good basis for making changes. I parenthetically listed the potential 'groups' and by doing so implied that I believed one group managed to convey a stronger voice than the rest without pointing a finger at a specific. I do have quite a few nits to pick with the survey, but there's clearly something here that you and I fundamentally disagree on: I definitely do not think that an online poll conducted over the course of a couple of weeks (this year *or* last year) is the correct way for a board to approach attempts to improve things, nor do I believe that those elected officials should be obligated to reflect the results of the survey as conducted. I *might* be convinced that if the survey were taken in a formal and correct manner, and results divided by district, that there's a reasonable argument for an elected official to give extremely heavy weight to what is expressed in that survey, but there are so many things wrong with the way this survey was conducted, starting with no way to know how the 'votes' might distribute across district lines and ending with the way it was constructed with options, communicated to the public on such a short time frame (both years, not just this one!). We could also talk about the intent of representative democracy if you like, or the value of elected school boards . Probably best to assume we'll disagree there as well, though.
Vanessa
11:02 am on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Have you looked at results from San Diego? North Carolina? Colorado? Just curious?
CJ
12:05 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Yes, Vanessa. One of the studies focused particularly on Maryland and North Carolina. Did you read what the statistical summaries of those implementations said and think through the differences between what's in LA and SD as compared with what the board is doing here?
Vote Again
11:11 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
I certainly do not think people who work while their children are in school are using the school as daycare...my husband and I both work full time jobs, have two very active young children and manage the same life struggles as everyone else. What I am saying is if you give no consideration to the teachers that are responsible for the education of your children and only "where can they go if we give these breaks" then that is daycare.
We've all paid for daycare (myself included, I'm no stay at home Mom) and the exact meaning of daycare is where you take your child so you can go to work. When you argue that teachers opinions should not be heard because you need a place to leave your child, can you give me a better "word" than daycare?
If the majority of teachers feel that's what they need to better teach then I can make arrangements for two weeks a year...just use the money I saved on summer camp.
J Holland
11:25 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
But what do you say to the information CJ has provided? Balanced calendars have historically not worked. The leading school districts in the country have a start just before or after labor day and finishing in June.
I am thinking more "Why are they NOT in school like every other schoold district" than "where will they go during this break" when I am making arrangements for their care during the new breaks.
Michael Jacobs
11:38 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
Thanks for focusing the discussion on the issues tonight, and please keep it going. I don't think this issue is going away. I appreciate everyone who didn't give up when we were suffering through technical difficulties. We're still new at this live-blogging thing, but we're going to get better at it. Good night, all.
Lisa56
1:39 am on Friday, February 18, 2011
Thank you Michael for allowing us to participate in this forum. I am saddened that there is such a marked divide within our community.
Vote Again
11:46 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
Ok for everyone who says this is about "education" and not about anything else (because we all want our child in school) will balanced or standard schedule save them from these kids.....
American children have it easier than most other children in the world, including the supposedly lazy Europeans. They have one of the shortest school years, a mere 180 days compared with an average of 195 for OECD countries and more than 200 for East Asian countries. German children spend 20 more days in school than American ones, and South Koreans over a month more. Over 12 years, a 15-day deficit means American children lose out on 180 days of school, equivalent to an entire year.
American children have one of the shortest school days, six-and-a-half hours, adding up to 32 hours a week. The school week is 37 hours in Luxembourg, 44 in Belgium, 53 in Denmark and 60 in Sweden. On top of that, American children do only about an hour’s-worth of homework a day, a figure that stuns the Japanese and Chinese.
Americans also divide up their school time oddly. They cram the school day into the morning and early afternoon, and close schools for 3 months in the summer. The long summer vacation acts like a mental eraser, with the average child reportedly forgetting about a month’s-worth of instruction in many subjects and almost three times that in mathematics. American academics have even invented a term for this phenomenon, “summer learning loss”
Kristi Vinson
11:49 pm on Thursday, February 17, 2011
Link to Moms Talk feature for more discussion. We value your feedback and input. Your voice matters: http://kennesaw.patch.com/articles/moms-talk-balanced-vs-traditional-school-calendar
CJ
9:36 am on Friday, February 18, 2011
Lisa: the comment wherein you questioned my basic math skills was posted before the link to the raw vote data was available for review. Further down, it appears you read the response in which I posted a link to the data and said that it was clear that the voting had gone in the balanced calendar direction. You may also have read (but not comprehended) the post where I stated that although the outcome of last night's meeting suited my own personal beliefs, I think the way that this has all come about is unfortunate and political at best. As usual, when things are politicized, there are guilty parties on both sides of the fence.
In my review of research on balanced/year-round calendar utilization, I came to an opinion about what I thought was best. And I factored it into our family's particular circumstances. It might surprise you to learn that I'm not esp. married to the "traditional calendar" - research indicates that certain variants of year-round schooling are the ideal. But for districts like Cobb, those models tend to cost quite a bit more than the 'balanced' models presented here last year ($ savings in these come from variants that create even more issues than our 'balanced' varieties do).
Decent summary of pros/cons w/biblio: http://www.indianaeducationforum.com/ssdacc.html There are 30+ yrs of research to explore. Definitely recommend the activity.
Side note: I'm a woman and mother of 2 boys in middle school and high school in CCSD, not a 'he'.
Lisa56
2:13 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Interesting that you make reference to Indiana Education Forum. My father taught in Indiana for more than thirty years. In an effort to prove that their reforms were benefitting the students and raising test scores the state department of education lowered the number of correct answers each year until that got the results that they needed to prove that the reform had worked. Surveys and test results can both be skewed for political benefit.
CJ
4:17 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
You're so *totally* right about that, Lisa! That's why I get so hot about the board members' not doing their research. It takes a lot of time to read broadly enough and think carefully enough about what matches up, what doesn't, what's applicable in one context but not in another, etc. Taken as a whole body of research, there are patterns and betters and worses, but it's just not a good idea to go off any one single data point. The research and stats around calendars in particular is really fraught with issues and bendable, because the causal links are very, very weak. No way to really prove that one start/stop pattern is the *cause* of a drop or a rise, esp when those drops/rises are barely outside the standard deviation.
Your point is also a really strong reason why using surveys (whether ill or well done) as the sole decision criteria is a flawed concept. Reminds me sometimes of how folks well versed in biblical text can bend things in some amazing frightening ways...
Pam J
10:35 am on Friday, February 18, 2011
I honestly don't know what all the hoopla is about. Kids get more breaks during the year than we did when I went to school. We didn't start until after Labor Day and went through May. Got a couple of breaks in there. The school system is not here to cater to your needs. They are here to give your child a free education. It is up to parents to work with it. All of you people who are whining about what's going to happen to your kids when they are out of school - this is an age-old problem. As a parent, your child is your responsibility. Don't expect the schools to bend over backwards to suit everybody's needs. And, no, I don't work for the school board! I just think you're all nuts.
Thomas Palmer
1:50 pm on Saturday, February 26, 2011
What's the big fuss about school beginning after Labor Day and ending May 31st.? If there are days when bad weather closes schools, then make up the days on any sunny Saturday before the last day in May. This allows three full months - June, July, August - for kids to work and earn bucks for college....or whatever.
Pam J
10:59 pm on Saturday, February 26, 2011
Hi Thomas, welcome to the biggest comment board out there! If you will scroll down towards the end, people are now more upset about not getting the September and February weeks off because they have planned and paid for vacations. I understand the frustration. It started out being a childcare issue, now it's evolved into a vacation issue. It's the story that will not die. And re-reading my comment, all nuts aren't bad.
CJ
10:56 am on Friday, February 18, 2011
I dunno, Pam. It's one of those polarizing kinds of issues, I guess. It seems to me that it's important to different people for different reasons. There are many who are upset because in their eyes, the board made a promise and is now reneging. There are some who are upset because one version or the other of the calendar makes their families' lives worse in any of a number of ways. There are some like me who are disturbed by the overall process and its execution. But for parental units and school employees, the question of scheduling hits very close to the bone, and so emotions and opinions run hot. Throw in some questionable election tactics and a generally tough situation with funding and education in general, and you get a hot mess... I know I've been running hot on this issue since last year and haven't managed to get over my upset. It just hits on so many fundamental beliefs and aspects of our daily lives. Other, possibly more important, things like budgets and splost allocations and architectural contracts are more abstract and removed from our individual contexts, maybe? Or, maybe you're right and we *are* all nuts! I'd buy that, maybe, if you didn't try to sell me that being nuts is always a bad thing...
Pam J
11:24 am on Friday, February 18, 2011
I understand why some people are mad. Anything that upsets your life will make you crazy. I guess I'm just confused as to why the school board allowed people to "vote" on the calendar. If you allow everybody to put their two cents' worth in, you are going to have problems and you are going to make the nightly news. Maybe it's a good thing that our politicians are getting the heat to a certain degree, but quite frankly I have just been embarrassed watching our residents on the local news. Why are they complaining? Because the school board can't seem to make up their minds? Fine. But I think everybody is getting a little carried away. Don't complain because you don't know what you are going to do with your kids during the breaks. Complain because the school board is acting strange. School breaks have always happened. A good parent will deal with it. Don't stand up there and cry because you work and have no idea what will happen to your child. Whether school starts in early August or mid-August really shouldn't be an issue.
CJ
12:06 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Nods. I do understand where you're coming from, Pam. My kids are older (middle and high), so daycare really isn't a consideration for me at this point, and given our split schedule, never has been too much of an issue. But I totally understand the feeling of helplessness that occurs when you can't find someone when you need them. I'd rather see people focusing on the facts of the situation, too.
Pam J
3:22 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
CJ, I understand that people are concerned about finding daycare, but if you look at the calendars (has anybody done that?) they will be better off with the traditional one. One less week during the school year to have to find somebody to take care of your kids. So I can't really figure out where the feeling of helplessness comes from. But you are correct, people are focusing on the wrong things.
Vote Again
11:12 am on Friday, February 18, 2011
I guess the test will be at election time...it the survey monkey was so off then those who voted to go back to the old calendar will be rewarded for their choices, if not then they will be gone and we will have our balanced calendar back. Believe me when I promise NOT to forget and to vote again for the official that supports the calendar I want. This is certainly not a done deal...we will make our voices heard at the ballot box and then we'll see how close the survey monkey was to right or wrong. If truly the choice for balanced schedules was 80% then I hope the "gang of four" enjoys their jobs while they still have one.
Lisa56
11:18 am on Friday, February 18, 2011
@Vote Again Sadly, the "gang of four" will remain at least the "gang of three" for the next four years. Let's make sure that the fourth member is ousted when her reelection is at hand.
CJ
12:11 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
VoteAgain, I don't think the survey was necessarily off - might be, might not be ( in terms of whether it truly represents the "will of the majority") - It seems really clear to me that balanced calendar supporters are passionate about it (though it might be a mystery to me why). But really, I think it's got to be the case that there are 'pockets' of people in certain districts who feel differently - there's no way for a board member to know numerically from this survey how *his or her* people voted, for example. I am aware that my post 6 member voted in the way I'd want him to, and if he'd gone with the survey, I dunno if that would have been right or wrong from a majority perspective. A real ballot would solve that, but state law says that the responsibility for setting calendars belongs to the boards within state established parameters (some states, like NC, have a law that prevents starting earlier than X, as well as the usual number of days and/or hours laws). So I'm pretty sure you're right that folks who are unhappy with their member's vote will need to vote at re-election time to deal with expressing their thoughts.
Lisa56
11:16 am on Friday, February 18, 2011
@CJ While we obviously have different opinions on the topic I certainly agree with your insight concerning why everyone is up in arms over this issue. This is definitely more of an individual issue than things like budgets, SPLOST, and new buildings. Thanks for your input.
CJ
12:11 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Yeah. People are very passionate about this one, and living in a glass house, I sure can't throw stones!
Lisa56
11:20 am on Friday, February 18, 2011
By the way CJ I love your comment that "being nuts" is not necessarily a bad thing...I agree completely. Those of us who are "nuts" seem to enjoy the fun of life a bit more.
See, we can agree on some things.
CJ
12:12 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Oh, I am sure that in 'real life' we'd get along just fine. Passionate, caring mothers often have far more in common that not. No doubt that'd be true here, too.
Vote Again
11:25 am on Friday, February 18, 2011
@ Lisa - We will not forget and even though my wonderful Harrison Board Member has supported the balanced calendar there is NO rule that says we cannot spend our time and money working against "Ms Unopposed" she thinks it was due to her half baked ideas...give me a break. She's there because of a tax cheat and she'll be gone in a flash! On another note it seems Harrison will receive the new freshman complex and we can get out of those awful trailers!! I'm sure they'll find a way to screw that up too.
Lisa56
11:32 am on Friday, February 18, 2011
@Vote Again - I'm ready to take on the fight! Is your Ms. Unopposed the same board member who suggested using prisoners for school maintenance? Our Ms. Unopposed is there for four years now unless she proves incapable of handling her opponents. From the contents of the email I received from her she has proven that to me. I'll be happy to help both of them pack up their things to make their exit from the school board easier.
Vote Again
11:37 am on Friday, February 18, 2011
Can anyone give a firm date on when any of the board members who voted for the old schedule come up for election again?
As I stated before, thank God our member has some sense and although we cannot vote outside our district there is nothing stopping us from our time and effort to kick somebody out of another area. Sometimes people need to rise up against politicians who forget we are to be "represented" by them not "dictated" to on and issue. If the majority truly wants the old calendar then I guess they'll all be there to vote on it again...but I have my doubts!!!
Vote Again
11:46 am on Friday, February 18, 2011
On another note I think EVERY parent supporting the balanced schedule owes it to the local businesses that would have received your money during September and February be patronized...I for one will be BOYCOTTING Six Flags this year!!!!!! Let’s all band together and show those goof balls on the board that supporting Six Flags over what our community wants will not put an additional dime in their pockets!
Michael Jacobs
12:27 pm on Friday, February 18, 2011
Good question, Vote Again. The terms for Lynnda Crowder-Eagle, David Morgan, David Banks and Alison Bartlett end Dec. 31, 2012, so Posts 1, 3, 5 and 7 will be up for election in fall 2012. Tim Stultz in Post 2, Kathleen Angelucci in Post 4 and Scott Sweeney in Post 6, the new members of the board, are due to come up for election in the fall of 2014.
Vote Again
12:33 pm on Friday, February 18, 2011
You can be I just put those names and dates on my calander...please let this be GOOD BYE Ms. Barlett
Kim
2:33 pm on Friday, February 18, 2011
Wonder what Ms Angelucci would think about a good old fashion boycott of her beloved Six Flags???
Vanessa
9:11 am on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Agree, She lost my respect with "grave concern" for Six Flags...Patch I think you have a chance to break a story here!! MDJ, is too biased to look into, after all they are the ones who got her elected!!!
J Holland
2:39 pm on Friday, February 18, 2011
Pam, my children are not getting a "free education". I pay taxes. We all pay taxes! I don't like the extra breaks because it effects my children negatively. They have a very hard time getting back into the groove, regardless of how much reading, etc we do at home. They are in elementary school, and many parents of older children have expressed how much it helps their older students.
Over the summer childcare is easier, as many of the Moms in my neighborhood swap days. Many of the parents in aren't able to do that in Sept and Feb because of vacations, etc.
Pam J
3:07 pm on Friday, February 18, 2011
I meant it was free as opposed to private schools. I pay school taxes and I don't have kids in school. I don't particularly think that's fair either, but it's the way it is. I looked at the different calendars and I don't really see a lot of difference, except at Christmas. It seems that most of you are more upset about the start date. If most of you don't like all of the breaks during the school year, why don't you suggest they do it like they did when I was a kid. Start school after Labor Day. That gives the kids three months during the summer to play. I don't know too many kids that wouldn't like that, regardless of what the survey said. And finding child care would be easier according to you. But to say that a lot of parents aren't able to find child care in September and February is moot since all three calendars have time off during the year, whether it's in September, October, November, December, January, February, March, April, or May. I don't think the time of year makes any difference. Am I wrong about this?
Patrick Cooper
2:44 pm on Friday, February 18, 2011
Let's stop them together! www.WorthlessPoliticians.com
J Holland
3:15 pm on Friday, February 18, 2011
Pam they do have time off, but it's usually a 3 day weekend. (unless it snows!)
Paying taxes without kids in school stinks.
I think all the calendars choices are awful, and I prefer the after labor day start as many of us had growing up. BUT that's not an option!
Pam J
4:41 pm on Friday, February 18, 2011
Okay, unless I'm reading the calendars wrong, this is how it breaks down: for the current school year, they have three weeks off (not including the holiday weeks), in September, February and April. On the calendar that has an August 1 start date, they have three weeks also, same months. The calendar for the August 15 start date shows just two full weeks off (not including holiday weeks). So if all you parents are worried about finding day care, why isn't the August 15 date preferable? What am I missing here?
CJ
12:13 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
I haven't made an attempt to count, Pam, but I think those who are taking up the potential daycare flag are happy with the outcome of 8/15. A lot of that conv. happened prior to the decision.
Pam J
3:15 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
It's really a simple issue. The Board can make any changes they want. I think it's great that we have the power to protest changes if we don't like them but rarely do our protests work, though. I still don't know what the big deal is if the kids start on 8/1 or 8/15. It's two weeks extra summer vacation. One less week during the school year that you have to find child care. Seems like that would be a no-brainer. Of course, if you made vacation plans based on the old calendar, it may be an issue, but only if you scheduled a vacation in September. That is the only week that was removed from the 8/1 calendar. You can still vacation in February and April and the holidays. I will admit that going to school the week before Christmas might cause problems for people who have to travel, but I have to believe that most people want to be home with their children on Christmas morning. I truly believe the whole issue is about the school board. It's gotten away from what is best for the kids. It's all about the people who took the survey and are unhappy that their wishes weren't granted. And since a daycare issue pertains to younger children, I'm guessing that they didn't vote on the survey.
Vote Again
3:25 pm on Friday, February 18, 2011
While I understand the views many of you have put forth the fact still remains that thousands and thousands of people e-mailed and showed up at town hall meetings in support of the balanced calendar (even if you don't believe the survey monkey) how can you justify ignoring those people? They are your friends, neighbors and co-workers and although you may not always agree on issues I still believe we must give consideration to the those numbers.
@ Holland this may be an issue that has ended up on the side you support but when you have elected board members say in open town halls and in printed media that it is their personal agenda that will be followed and not the will of their constituents that is more troublesome to me that anything else...it could be your issue blown off next time. Keep that in mind and hold people accountable for their representation of your community not just to be a "winner" on one issue. That sort of public official comes back to bite everyone.
Pam J
4:50 pm on Friday, February 18, 2011
When did deciding the school year schedule become an issue that the public could decide? Hasn't it always been the decision of the school board? I agree that maybe the general public should have some input in the matter, but it is a law that we should? I have lived in Cobb County all my life, and I have to admit that I don't know.
J Holland
4:56 pm on Friday, February 18, 2011
I don't think anyone is winning here. I think it's deplorable that the current board reversed the decision that was voted on last year.
I remember last year, when the balanced calendar was introduced people hated the idea and in turn many of the opponents of the balanced calendar were voted in (or ran unopposed). Many people have changed their minds and now prefer it. The board, IMO, made 2 huge mistakes.
1.Put out a survey (which many believed was a vote) and do whatever the heck they wanted anyway.
2. Reverse the calendar before the first year runs its course.
I know this list could be much, much longer.
cobb resident
5:44 pm on Friday, February 18, 2011
The school year is 180 days no matter how you look at it. Single parents and working parents are still going to have to find someone to look after their children the same amount of days. School is not babysitting. Teachers would be getting paid A LOT more if you paid them the way babysitters get paid. If you really want to look at data, how about the fact that there were 8,700 less teacher absences during the first half of the year. To me that is a powerful statistic and it benefits the children.
Roxane Gatlin Schiliventz
7:28 pm on Friday, February 18, 2011
Does anyone think that Six Flags and White Water being in Cobb County might have had something to do with this? Both tend to set their seven day a week calendars according to the Cobb County school schedule. A longer summer would obviously impact their bottom line which would equal a substantial increase in tax revenue $$$$ for Cobb County. I'm a mother in Paulding County, but I'm interested in this story because Paulding recently adopted the balanced calendar as well. Personally, I love it.
Michael Jacobs
7:39 pm on Friday, February 18, 2011
Hi, Roxane, I'm glad you asked. That was a recurring theme during the public comments from balanced-calendar proponents last night. Several speakers accused Board of Education members of putting the needs of Six Flags ahead of the needs of schoolchildren. It reminded me of when I was in high school and Virginia passed a law requiring all school districts to start after Labor Day; it was popularly known as the Kings Dominion Relief Act because the common belief was that the law's purpose was to ensure the maximum tourist season for the theme parks in the commonwealth. That was a quarter-century ago, and the law remains in effect.
Vanessa
9:14 am on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Michael, I have Ms. Angelucci email..quote with her " grave concern" regarding loss of revenue for six flags, a number I could not get six flags to confirm or deny! Interesting??
Lisa56
8:13 pm on Friday, February 18, 2011
This is a portion of the response to a very reasonable email (not "jacked up") I sent to Kathleen Angelucci:
A loss of income for companies such as Six Flags and White Water, (that are primarily open during the hottest month of the year when 107,000+ Cobb students are not attending because they are in school), means a loss of revenue FOR THE COBB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT. Six Flags and White Water have to shut down as well as other businesses because attendees and teachers and their families are in school. For just two weeks of August, Six Flags reported a $2.4 million dollar loss – that means a loss of TAX revenue FOR THE COBB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT as we directly benefit which in turn also means less SPLOST revenue. I don’t give a flip about Six Flags except that it means Cobb County School District receives less tax revenue which means less money to pay for teachers and less SPLOST projects being completed. That DIRECTLY affects the classroom. Less teachers mean larger classrooms; less SPLOST could mean a delay in refreshing textbooks and or completing projects that directly affect the classroom and students. (There is a direct correlation)
SPLOST III is a 1 cent additional sales task that the voters of Cobb County approved in the fall of 2008, as I recall. It did not have anything to do with hiring more teachers. One percent of 2.4 million dollars if $24,000. CCSD wastes more than that in a month on replacement of working equipment. Other tax revenues lost?
Vanessa
9:37 am on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Cobb County School District Handbook
District Expectation:
"The Cobb County School (District) acknowledges that effective district reaches it's full potential only when it knows and meets the needs of it's students and OPERATES based on a mission and vision, SUPPORTED by MEANINGFUL, CONCRETE GOALS, DEVELOPED AND SHARED by it's STAKEHOLDERS. "
So are you White Water/Six Flags is it Stakeholder??
Did the board know and meet the needs of students?
Was the decision supported by meaningful, concrete goals?.
No, it was a self serving campaign promise! And probably a pay off by White/Six-!!
Vanessa
9:42 am on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Also, The number 2.4 million came from Representative Matt Dollar, when I contact both Six Flags/Matt Dollar and Ms. Angelucci-
Six Flags would not confirm or deny that number? I find that interesting??
Matt Dollar never respond back
Ms. Angelucci just site that she got the figure from Mr. Dollar, but could not provide data or accounting to back it up! Again interesting ?
Lisa56
8:14 pm on Friday, February 18, 2011
Does anyone have a suggestion on how to start a grassroots campaign against the election of board members who refuse to vote as the respresentative of their constituents wishes? I would love to sign on!
Pam J
5:08 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Good luck with that! It would be a full-time job trying to oust every public figure who didn't live up to our expectations.
Vanessa
12:48 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Reason maybe @why people are upset
1. Ms. Angelucci proospesd revisiting the calendar. When question via email on why she was revisiting this issue her first response was " Grave concern regarding lost of revenue of 2.4 million for Six Flags and White Water". I contact Six Flags and White water- They would not confirm or deny that figure. I found that interesting. I also found it interesting that they only denied having contact with Ms.Angelucci and did not deny having contact with any board member?
2. Angelucci, Stultz, Sweeny, Bartlett and Morgan voted on FEb 9, for a survey so that they could get the input of the community. Banks and Eagle opposed.
3. A teacher question Ms. Angelucci via email regarding her logic and reasoning behind switching the calendar. She responded by saying the teacher insulted her-very unprofessional in my opinion. The email simple broke down her logic using her data in classroom. There was no insult. It simple asked her to honor the board promise for three years.
4. Marrietta Daily Journal quotes a close associate of Allison Bartlett "She's going to favor the traditional calendar. and you should take all of that "bet" you can get it will pass" This quote was on Tue/Wed, before the results of the survey.
5. Tim Stultz, is quoted on Channel 2 new wednesday ( again before the results of the suvey) as saying " I don't think having majority opinion should sway decisions of lawmakers". It s funny he does not even know he is not a "lawmaker"
Lisa56
2:19 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
I question if he can even spell "lawmaker"!
Vanessa
12:58 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
6, Ms. Angelucci changed her reason via email she is changing the calendar to fulfill her "Campaign Promise". Please note she ran upoosed in th general election. Besides that fact her campaign slogan was/is "Putting Public back in Public Education" and she wants her tenure to be " very collaborative" and she believes its " time to mend relationships" and "restore the excellent reputation of the Cobb School have enjoyed int he past"
7. The survey did not show the results the "Fab Four " wanted, so did they speak as to why they wanted to change the calendar -no not at the Feb 17 meeting.
Trust is broken, Ms. Angelucci is not mending relationship, or keeping the public in public education- she is simple causing undo stress on parents and teachers for her own personal and political agenda.
I am not for One Calendar or Another- but before the board makes a sudden and drastic decision like this , they need to present a better argument to me than "keeping campaign promises" I suggest everyone read the District Expecations in the Board Handbook and ask yourself- DO you really believe the board lived up to those expectations ?
CJ
3:13 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
I think with this, we can definitely find common ground, Vanessa: "before the board makes a sudden and drastic decision like this , they need to present a better argument." It may be the case that my particular board member is better aligned with my desires than most, but this board and the last one both fail on that count for me!
Lisa56
2:21 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Vanessa, thanks so much for your research I hadn't even considered investigating the Board Handbook. I love that the Gang of Four has proven their own ignorance of the Cobb County School Board mission statement. Perhaps there should be a test before they can vote again.
Vanessa
2:38 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
@Lisa 56
Please note that I am arguing against Ms. Angelucci postion-not yours, but I know you already figures that out :)
Lisa56
4:59 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
I certainly do. I think I want you for my best friend. You go at things with the same furor as me.
I hadn't thought about AYP and the number of absences. Ha Ha. Yet another piece of info those who "voted their conscience" rather than for the wishes of their constituients failed to factor in. We all have standards of which we should be proud to uphold. Unfortunately, the politician bug has invaded our newly elected board members and they believe themselves to be immune to an expectation of decency.
Vanessa
3:37 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
@PAM, The February break was removed. They have Feb 20 off for president's day. Yes, people have PAID for vacations in Sept or Feb so are now stuck making the tough decision, do they loose their money or pull their children out of school?
Another reason parents are upset, is the calendar now goes to Dec 23, making it difficult for families to travel out of town for Christmas.
attendance is important, Annual Yearly Progress is partially based on attendance! WE could loose money is attendance lowers!
Also I question not to you but in general " Why is the board allowed to make any changes they want" Do we have no standards to live up to. I know they did not read their handbook. There are standards listed there.
Also PAM, you must note that Angelucci, Stultz, Barlett, Sweeny, &Morgan -voted FOR the survey, but then after the results did NOT show their desired outcome, decided to ignore, except for Morgan. They are the ones that asked for community impute through the survey!
Pam J
3:53 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Vanessa, you are correct about the February break. But it does show that kids would have fewer breaks during the year. And, yes, those who have paid for September vacations will have problems. And going until December 23 will be an issue for some people also. I understand all of this, but there has been so much talk about how kids don't need so many breaks. They don't get as many breaks with the 8/15 and 8/17 schedule. And I agree that the school board is a little screwed up. The survey should never have been put out there. I think it's great that SOMETHING got parents motivated, but this survey was going to be a problem from the start. These people were elected by us. Granted, some of them had no competition, but that just tells me how little the parents care. If we care so much about our kids' education, why aren't there 100 people lining up to run for the school board? That's how you make changes. If there is only one person running for each district, that spells apathy in capital letters.
Vanessa
4:11 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
@ Pam- the talk has been whether or not kids need breaks during the school, I could also add the argument do kids need long summers- again it is about Preference. It is a real concern for parents when they are going to be out money or explaining/defending themselves to a social worker because they pulled their children out for a vacation they already paid for.
Again, I agree that the survey should have never been put out there, but those who voted for it, should have given it more credit than they did. It just did not show the results they wanted.
I agree about running for school board, I was not happy with either Republcan Candidate. I know as an independent , I would have to run as Republican or Democrat. I know being a Democrat in Cobb County will probably not get you far. Maybe if they changed the system so you do not have to declare a party, more people would run? I do not know. I agree with the apathy, believe it or not I was very involved with getting Angelucci elected, she shore to be she was just a concern PTA with the way the board was behaving. She wanted to mend fences. I do not believe she is doing either.
I do like that discussion is happening!
CJ
3:51 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
@Vanessa, here's a good review of legal requirements and responsibilities from the Southern Regional Education Board. In general, calendar establishment parameters are set by state laws and delegated (with parameters limiting the scope of freedom) to boards.
http://publications.sreb.org/2010/10S03_Focus_School_Cal.pdf
CJ
3:54 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Also, in light of Vote Again's query about America's comparatives to European and Asian systems, I came across these handy dandy tables from the EU council showing start dates across countries (weird that Japan's got schools listed, too...) Interesting to read through, actually.
Northern Hemisphere: http://www.ecis.org/uploaded/Schools_Calendar/Northern.pdf
Southern Hemisphere: http://www.ecis.org/uploaded/Schools_Calendar/Southern.pdf
Vanessa
4:16 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Thanks CJ-I just wished it said or I wish Georgia had standards that a calendar must be approved 1 or 2 years in advance.
Michael Jacobs
4:11 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Two quick notes. First, the Cobb Board of Education will start working on the budget March 1 at 5 p.m. at the Central Office, so that's when some of the scary numbers flying around will begin to become real. Second, at least we're not DeKalb County: http://patch.com/A-fjMc.
Lisa56
5:06 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Or Clayton County, or Atlanta City... That still doesn't make our board look great, it just makes it look less bad.
There will be plenty of funny money numbers thrown out with the budget and then at the last minute there will be another miracle and an extra $64,000,000 will show up just in time to hire back everyone they fired.
Vanessa
4:19 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
@Michael Jacobs- do you know something we do not? Why are the numbers going to be scary??
Michael Jacobs
4:34 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
No, I don't know anything specific. The school board has talked about the budget at times this month and last, and those discussions have involved budget shortfalls in the tens of millions of dollars. But the numbers have involved lots of guesswork about tax collections and the state budget. We decided at Patch not to dive into the numbers before the real budget work starts because the numbers are so fuzzy. There hasn't been talk about anything nearly as bad as last year, but some cuts seem inevitable. And some of the speakers at the school board meeting Thursday speculated on the budget being in crisis. We'll just have to see what comes out next month.
Lisa56
5:13 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
The budget will become the next new horror to be introduced to the public. By introducing frighteningly large cuts to next year's budget and then miraculously finding the money at the last minute the reputations of our board members will be restored and all will be right with the world. Or maybe not....
Catherine
7:31 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
I spent a great deal of time at the Dome last session, haven't been able to this year. State revenues were way down last year, as we all know. I can tell you that last year, the legislators were all predicting that this year's numbers would be even worse. My concern about this entire issue is that the state could further reduce the number of school days. If we have a balanced calendar, those reductions could create even more days off. While that sounds great to those who like the breaks, what is the implication for the children.
I saw an earlier post on this thread that when the board voted in the balanced calendar in Nov 2009 that it was very popular. That is simply not the fact. I was there that day. There were 19 public speakers, 18 in favor, one ambivalent and zero in favor.
Vanessa
8:05 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
According th Deal State of the State, He pledge to make k-12 a top Priority by 1) by ending teachers furlough days and 2) restoring money so district will be able to operate at 180 days. When I spoke with Representative Ed Seltzer, he pedigree no further cuts in education and again stress Gov Nathan Deal commitment to education.
Again, the children will go to school 180 day whether it's spread out over 9 months, 10 months, 11 months or 12 months.
Yes, I know Georgia Needs Summers is very vocal at School Board Meetings, I have a feeling things will change soon and more parents will speak and be heard !
Catherine
11:51 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
You're right, that's what Deal said. Time will tell as to whether or not he is able to keep his word about furloughs. My suspicion is that they will have to furlough because the money isn't going to be there due to downturn in economy. I am not convinced that the kids will go to school for 180 days- they aren't going 180 days this year. They reduced it to 175 due to budget cuts. Could be fewer next year. Only time will tell on that one.
Michael Jacobs
5:21 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
You might be right, Lisa56. Even more reason to hold off on reporting much on the budget for now.
Vanessa
6:41 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
@Pam, you are right, you family is lucky to have a caring Aunt who is involved. Thank-you for being a concern taxpayer, we need more people like you. Agree or Disagree healthy debate is good for the community.
Stay involved!
Pam J
12:17 am on Sunday, February 20, 2011
Thank you for the positive response. People are having a hard time seeing the forest for the trees, for lack of a better way to put it. But it is good to see parents getting motivated about something. Cobb County has always been a great place to live and I hope it continues to be so since I don't want to live anywhere else (besides on the beach in Florida).
Vanessa
6:42 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
@Michael Jacobs, thank-you!
Robin
7:02 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
The issue is much bigger and much more serious than this!!
We were promised a balanced calendar for three years. New board members ran on a platform to change this and this was not their right. This is about their own personal agendas!
Not only this, they asked us for our votes once again and then completely dismissed the results even though they were overwhelmingly in favor of keeping the current calendar.
If this was not enough, they even ignored the recommendations of their Superintendent to keep the promised three-year balanced calendar.
This shows not only blatant disregard for the policies already set in place but a total disrespect for authority and for the opinions of the parents, students, teachers and administrators they serve.
IF they are allowed to get away with this what will they do next?!
Please spread the word and sign the petition to stop the Cobb County School Board from changing our calendar.
http://www.petitions24.com/ccsd_calender
Lisa56
11:05 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
Unfortunately, power is not something that is fairly shared by those consider it to be theirs. Until we, the people of Cobb County, regain the power that has been taken from us the Cobb County School Board will continue to make decisions based on their own misguided opinions rather than the desires of the citizens of Cobb County. Make sure that you share your opinions with the each member of the board and do your best to ensure that others you know do the same. At worst, we will continue to hear about "jacked up" emails. At best, there will be resignations of members who can't stand the heat.
Barb Sargeant
12:25 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
Too bad we can't fix stupid. But we CAN RECALL!
Pam J
9:58 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
You can recall, but it will take a long time. I read the steps you have to take and it is not easy. And you have to find somebody else who cares enough to run for the position. There has been a lot of heated discussions going on about this issue, but if I remember correctly, a lot of the board members ran unopposed. My own humble opinion is that unless you have scheduled and paid for a vacation in September or February, just accept the fact that your kids will probably enjoy having two more weeks of summer (like everybody else in this country). Of course they probably liked the week off in September (stupid), one in February and one in April. The other two calendars don't have three weeks off. Which should make parents happy.
Catherine
10:12 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
Thanks for your rational comments, Pam. I actually do political and campaign work, so I'm very familiar with the recall process, and it is virtually impossible. They might be able to get through the petition process, but that's it. You cannot recall a seated elected official because of the way they vote in office. It just doesn't work that way. The real question is how much of their lives people are willing to give up to their anger and hatred. Of the seated board members, I think LCE is the only one who ran unopposed.
People who legitimately and truly paid for a vacation prior to Feb 17 should be responsible parents, go the their kids schools, make arrangements to get their kids' work and go. But if you paid for that trip on or after Feb 18 then you knew the school schedule.
Pam J
10:34 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
Thank you Catherine. I honestly believe that if you scheduled a vacation for September or February that you should be able to get your money back. But I think it's not even about that any more. I think it's simply about the board members changing their minds. It's turned into a hatefest. But I am happy that the parents decided to get involved.
Michael Jacobs
10:10 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
Pam, the only current member of the school board who was unopposed for election is Kathleen Angelucci. That, of course, doesn't mean it would be easy to find other people willing to commit the time and energy required to serve on the Board of Education. As the past week has shown, it's a hard job that can make you the target of a lot of anger.
Pam J
10:26 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
Yes, this has been a very heated debate. I, for one, would not want to be on that board. Regardless of whether they had any opposition in the election, there still weren't hundreds of people lining up for the position. In fact, there were several different positions that had only one person running. Sad.
Catherine
10:19 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
Michael, you are factually incorrect. Kathleen had opposition in the primary. There was no opposing party candidate in Nov. Let's look at what the Dems are putting up, BTW- the Dem who ran against Judy Manning and Ed Setzler were not serious candidates in any way.
In any case, there was opposition.
Michael Jacobs
10:34 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
Hi, Catherine, my apologies for not being clear. I was referring only to the general elections in 2010 and 2008. LCE did face an opponent in the general election in 2008, by the way. But you are correct: Opposition is opposition, regardless of whether it's within or outside the party. So all of the seven current board members did face opposition.
Catherine
11:03 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
I appreciate the clarification. I couldn't remember about that seat.
Vanessa
10:38 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
yes, Kathleen Angelucci had opposition in the primaries, but MDJ did a great job on keeping the focus on her opposition taxes. Heck, that is why I voted for HER in the primaries.
Every interview I have read, she has not stated her first and only priority was changing the calendar ex:
http://cobbcommunitycares.com/cobb-schools/board-of-education-candidate-profile-kathleen-angelucci/
and what do you suggest a parent to do if a teacher/s will not cooperate and a child fails a test because a parent are taking the child out of school? Yes, they have paid prior to the calendar change on GOOD FAITH and previous years that the calendar DOES NOT change at the last minute?
Also Catherine- are you part of Georgia needs summers or do you work for Six Flags/White Water?
Catherine
11:02 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
Vanessa,
The smug nasty tone is unnecessary. I have no affiliation with Georgia Needs Summers, Six Flags/White Water. Like I've said before, the dates on the calendar don't matter to me.
Thanks,
Catherine
Catherine
11:07 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
Vanessa,
You ask a legitimate question about the grading and testing issue. Contact the board members and ask them to make a policy to provide what you just raised. Draft up what you want it to contain and champion that issue.
Catherine
Vanessa
11:08 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
within a couple of months are your key words- if you planned a vacation in Sept. in the last six-months, chances are you will not get all of your money back.
I have a friend who yes planned a cruise in Sept- they have runned the numbers they will be out $1500 if they cancel ( half)-what would you do?
What would you do if your sister a teacher planned a wedding for Sept break, and now fears she might loose her job or the $8000 she already put into it? Family has made arrangements to travel.
Calendar are made a year or two in advance and this is the FIRST time I have ever known it to be changed at the last minute.
Trust has been broken- that is the heart of the issue.
But, Six Flags and Georgia Need Summers- are rejoicing!
Catherine
11:16 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
Vanessa-
The teacher my child had last year is getting married at end of March this year so that she'll have two weeks off. She's taking last week of March and first week of April (Spring Break week) so she'll have two weeks. Notice that the February break didn't factor into that for her.
I can understand your sister's concern, but I've had children graduate out Cobb schools, they've had teachers get married during the school year. She isn't going to lose her job because she got married during the school year.
Vanessa
11:19 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
@ Catherine- sorry for smug tone, I wanted to make sure , because you have mention being involved political process before.
As far as emailing the board -I have both before and after the vote-asking that question- to date to no response.
and
Yes Pam and Catherine-I have paid for a condo in Sept because I am attending my neice's wedding . She actually planned it around when my family could be there. We did not start the planning process until after the passing of the calendars in 2009.
The other reason I am upset is I will not get to spend Christmas with my family- there is not enough time to travel- going to Dec 23, is just crazy.
I hope the school attendence policy and teachers are cooperative
Catherine
11:42 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
Vanessa-
Like I said, I've had children graduate so I've been at this for a while. None of my family lives here so I'm in the same boat as you with the traveling. However, there have been many, many times that school has gotten out a few days before Christmas. Calendars fell that way when I was growing up too.
IMHO, the attendance policies need to be managed according to the kids with attendance issues instead of this ridiculous "one-size-fits-all" approach of getting 5 day absence notices and 10 day social worker intervention. I can tell you at the time that was implemented, I called the central office and asked why they were doing that. They told me at the time it was because certain parts of the student population were pulled out to work or babysit for their younger siblings when their parents work. That is very sad to me. However, I think they need to address their policy to the kids with that issue rather than across the entire population. When my youngest child had a tonsillectomy they knew it advance (via Dr.'s note) and I still got their stupid social worker letter. That's just make work and wastes money.
Pam J
11:44 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
Vanessa, I'm curious as which cruiseline you are talking about, because all of the major cruiselines will fully refund your money if you cancel the cruise 60 days before the cruise (not 60 days after you book it). It's February, so that is most definitely 60 days before the cruise in September. Of course, I would be unhappy at having to cancel a cruise too. And having the kids in school on 12/23 is nuts, but it's always difficult to schedule holiday weeks when the holiday falls on a weekend. But I agree that this is wrong. One of my neighbors is a teacher at an elementary school in Austell (Sanders) and she got married during the school year (not a vacation week). And I am sorry about any issues you will have because of this and I hope that everything works out.
Vanessa
10:46 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
@PAM, who should we get the money back from? You put up a deposit in good faith, the travel/condo companies let you know , no refunds. insurance is only for natural disater and if you get sick- not because you or the board changed their minds. Should the board use taxpayers money to refund everyone vacations? NO, I do not think so. So, most people will pull their children out of school,
If board had waited for 2012-2013 school year, maybe people would not be so upset
But, Georgia Need Summers and Six Flags just could not wait!
Pam J
10:56 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
In my own humble opinion, if you put up a non-refundable deposit for something, that is not a good thing. Even cruise lines, who have the strictest refund policies out there, will refund all of your money if you cancel within a couple of months of the trip. And, yes, I do understand why everybody is upset. I get it. But since I kept hearing all those people complaining about having to find childcare, I just didn't understand why the balanced calendar was better. And having a week off six weeks after you start school is crazy too. I don't really want to keep arguing about this, but I am unemployed and I have nothing else to do! :)
Lisa56
11:19 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
Although I am not a psychic I predict an outbreak of weeklong illness in late September, 2011 and in the week leading up to the winter holiday break in December, 2011. The system social workers will be so overwhelmed by the number of absences that investigations will have to be postponed. If a family has a vacation planned based on the calendar presented prior to the board meeting of Feb. 17, 2011 I wish you a wonderful week away from Cobb County. May your children be healthy and quiet about where they will be during that time. Have fun!!!
Lisa56
10:53 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
I wonder why there has to be a political affiliation listed for each candidate. Because a school board position is intended to be the voice of the people in matters of education what does one's political affiliation have to do with being elected. Being a Democrat I wouldn't even consider running for any Georgia school board position. I might just as well flush the money I would spend on a campaign down the toilet. Perhaps this is the fight we should fight. It might be interesting to see how many candidates there would be with that small change.
This is going to be a rocky four years for Cobb County education. I'm afraid we have only seen the very slightest bit of opposition at work. The verbal and physical altercations exhibited during heated board meetings last year will seem like child's play in comparison to what we are likely to see in upcoming board meetings.
Vanessa
10:58 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
@Lisa56- yes, we could be best friend- I thought that way since I moved here. I'm an independent- and feel I could never run for board for the reason you stated!
Michael Jacobs
11:06 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
I don't like partisan school board elections in principle, but even the officially nonpartisan school board elections I've seen have really been partisan, with each party organization lining up behind a candidate who's a member of that party. It seems to be the natural state of things. On the positive side, this board does not break along party lines. Democrats and Republicans have been on both sides of this issue and all the other 4-3 votes since the new members came on board in January.
Michael Jacobs
11:19 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
Because it keeps coming up and because we want to be fair and accurate, I want to be sure everyone has seen our clarification regarding Kathleen Angelucci's "jacked up" comment. We were mistaken in the initial story to put the quote marks after "e-mails." Her reference Feb. 9 was to the number of messages, not their content. She said some misinformation about the proposed calendar changes had gotten out to the public, and "that information that was put out definitely jacked up the amount of e-mails that came through."
Catherine
11:32 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
Michael- I appreciate seeing that you are trying to correct the Patch's incorrect quotation of Kathleen Angelucci regarding "jacked up emails". I was unaware that the Patch had incorrectly quoted her. Were you at the board meeting last week? If you were, then you know one of the speakers used that against her at the podium. In the name of responsible journalism, you should also appear as a public speaker at the next meeting and make a formal retraction. That woman was even on the TV news saying that. It's the right thing to do and will restore your integrity.
That's the kind of tactic tabloids use. If you want to be taken seriously, it's what you need to do. If you don't, it will tell me everything I need to know about you and The Patch.
Michael Jacobs
11:56 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
Catherine, I'm not sure what we should retract. We originally quoted her as saying "jacked-up e-mails." We corrected that two days later to reflect the full quote, which did use "jacked up" in reference to e-mails. The context and, I believe, meaning were accurately conveyed from the start; we just made a mistake about where to put the closing quotation marks and corrected that mistake.
I was at the meeting and did hear the speaker's comment. Within the bounds of public debate, I think her comment reasonably reflected what Kathleen Angelucci meant: The number of e-mail messages was artificially inflated and thus not reflective of public opinion. And because she was speaking Thursday night, not writing, I can't say where she closed the quote, but she was accurate in the use of the phrase "jacked up."
I can't promise to appear at the next regular board meeting to make a statement about the jacked-up comment (I'm not sure where I'll be a week from now, let alone a month from now), but it's a possibility. I appreciate the suggestion.
Lisa56
12:22 pm on Monday, February 21, 2011
According to my 20 something children, in today's venacular, "jacked up" refers to something or someone being "stupid". While I certainly do not want to put words in anyone's mouth I do wonder what Ms. Angelucci was truly saying when using the words "jacked up". It certainly appears as though she considers her constituents to be too stupid to contribute to her votes as a board member. I find no reason for Michael to do anything more than has already been done to explain a typographical mistake.
Robin
11:33 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
If you are for keeping the balanced calendar and making the board keep it's promise of a three-year calendar please sign the petition and spread the word!
http://www.petitions24.com/ccsd_calender
Vanessa
11:42 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
Michael-now I wonder what "misinformation about the proposed calendar changes had gotten out to the public"
The rumors I heard was that Angelucci was looking to changed the calendar back to traditional ( as she stated in her email to me)- So, since rumor ended up being true - where/what is the "misinformation" she is referring to?
"jacked up" was not a good way to put things regardless of if it was before or afterwards, but people say things they sometime regret. My issue is not with her wording- she has been rude and unprofessional in her (Angelucci) email responses.
Michael Jacobs
12:03 pm on Monday, February 21, 2011
Here's what our reporter recorded Kathleen Angelucci saying Feb. 9:
"With regards to the e-mails that have been coming in, there was unfortunately … there was some incorrect and false information that was put out to the entire district with regards to this calendar and what it would mean and that if we started later that Thanksgiving break would be taken and Christmas holidays would be severely cut. … The unfortunate thing there was that it caused some unnecessary concerns and artificially raised the ire of parents and teachers throughout the district. They were under the impression that certain things had already been determined and that things were going to happen. And it just wasn’t true. And it was unfair because what it did, it ... clouded the … perception of what was going to happen. And it just wasn’t fair. …
"Mr. Banks raised this issue at one of the previous meetings that we’re going to get all these e-mails, so that information that was put out definitely jacked up the amount of e-mails that came through.
"And I just … I thought that was very unfortunate. I will tell you every board that comes in looks at what is best for the district with regards to the students. … If we’re looking at these kinds of budget deficits, I think that it is very important that we consider everything, and part of that is this calendar. And there is no doubt that there are savings by going to school later and having these schools open later in August."
Lisa56
12:29 pm on Monday, February 21, 2011
I believe that Ms. Angelucci would benefit from both lessons in political etiquette and effective communication, both spoken and written. She seems to be of the opinion that everyone is entitled to Kathleen Angelucci's opinions.
This is just a blip on what will be a difficult four years for us all. Heaven help us.
Robin
11:49 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
Pam - I am a travel agent. There are many venues that have nonrefundable policies or at the least charge change fees, not all, but many. There are also many hotel and condo affiliations that offer a discounted, nonrefundable rate as well. It's not uncommon at all. It's a way for vendors to offer a better rate in return for your guarantee to visit. In exchange, you are willing to accept the loss if you cannot travel for any reason. It's a trade off.
Pam J
1:34 pm on Monday, February 21, 2011
I understand the non-refundable thing with some vacations, but I still think it's a bad idea to book a trip that would offer no refund if you had to cancel, and I don't think it should be allowed. There are so many things that could happen (not including a psycho school board). If just one person gets sick, if you have car problems, if there is a weather problem (remember, September is hurricane season) and a slew of other things. And I do feel bad for the people who may lose money. This will be a lesson learned, probably.
Robin
1:41 pm on Monday, February 21, 2011
I see both sides. You can't live your life for what if's on one hand and if you can get a great deal by booking nonrefundable it's a plus. On the other had, I see what you mean and that is why there are other versions and insurance. That said even some insurance policies won't cover a "psycho school board" issue. ; )
Vanessa
1:55 pm on Monday, February 21, 2011
Pam, I think you are missing the point, vacations are often planned a year in advance. Yes, it is a risk that people take, but if you planned a vacation according to an APPROVED calendar that was published on the WEBSITE for THREE YEAR forward.
NO board has previously (to my knowledge) changed a calendar the previous board has APPROVED before- especially at such late notice.
Also, people know of risk when when planning in advance, such risk oas illness, death of family etc.
Also, if people loose money, this will also negatively effect Cobb Economy, if a parent loses a $100, $ 1000 dollar deposit, the is less money they have to pump into the Cobb 's economy.
Also by booking vacation in advance and paying less, there is more of a family's disposable income again, they just might put that money into Cobb's economy.
You should be praising parents for being responsible, instead of mocking them for trying to save money.
Regarding tax guy-I guess they do not understand the question because it yes or no-lol
Pam J
3:00 pm on Monday, February 21, 2011
Hey, I'm just stating my opinion here. I still think that booking a trip with no chance of getting any money back if you cancel is a bad idea. I agree that the school board has created a mess. I totally agree that the vacation schedule is screwed up. That is not what I was originally commenting on. People were complaining because they thought with the traditional calendars they would have to find additional day care. As you and everybody is now pointing out, you lose two weeks with the traditional calendar, hence less day care. So what is this argument really about? Vacations or day care?
Pam J
11:51 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
Well, I've got errands to run. Carry on.
Robin
11:53 am on Monday, February 21, 2011
Vanessa,
I too received rude e-mail responses from Angelucci as well. When I countered each issue she tried to bring up as her "proof" against the balanced calendar she asked me why I was being rude instead of staying focused on the topic at hand. I wasn't being rude. Just to the point. I guess she couldn't take the heat so she felt she had to change the subject.
Pam J
1:41 pm on Monday, February 21, 2011
Quite frankly, I'm beginning to think that all of the Cobb County officials have a problem with being nice (and smart). I e-mailed the tax assessor to ask if we were getting our homestead exemption tax credit back this year, and he (Phil Hogsed, Director) e-mailed me back and said he didn't understand my question. Like I've said, I have lived in this county all my life, and things are just getting weird.
Lisa56
5:16 pm on Monday, February 21, 2011
@Robin A bully such as Kathleen Angelucci does not understand reasonable debate. That is why she accused you of being rude. The CCSD has a bullying expert on staff - Jeff Dess - I believe that it is time for Mr. Dess to introduce himself to Ms. Angelucci.
Has anyone received responses from the other members of the "Gang of Four Idiots"? I emailed each of the board members and received responses from Lynda Crowder-Eagle, David Banks, and Kathleen Angelucci. I would consider only one of the three responses to be rude. Can you guess who?
Vanessa
1:05 pm on Monday, February 21, 2011
@Michael- thank-you for the whole quote-it makes me wonders a few things even more............
Lisa56
12:43 pm on Tuesday, February 22, 2011
New label for Social Studies books in Cobb County School District - "Representative government is merely a theory. The majority of the CCSD School Board does not agree with this theory"
Kim
12:47 pm on Thursday, February 24, 2011
Wanted to state "for the record" that our family has a week long cruise booked "nonrefundable" for the nonexistent Feb vacation with Carnival. The discount is substantial and YES of course we have cruise insurance which will NOT cover "we changed our mind". The insurance covers specific emergency situations only....so we'll be gone in Feb
Robin
3:02 pm on Thursday, February 24, 2011
Sign the petition to keep the current calendar if you have not already done so: http://www.petitions24.com/ccsd_calender
Pass it on!
Lisa56
6:32 pm on Thursday, February 24, 2011
@Kim I suggest that your children start acting sick the week before your cruise. Practice makes perfect when faking an illness. Oh, yes, I believe that your children may well have a fake cold sometime in February next year and it will be miraculously cured by a wonderful cruise. Let the "Gang of Four Idiots" prove that your children were not absent due to illness.
Pam J
7:44 pm on Thursday, February 24, 2011
Kim, are you sure you can't get a refund? That is a year away and their rules state that you can get a refund if you cancel up to 70 days before the cruise. I had to do that about a year ago, and I cancelled the cruise 82 days before the cruise and I got all of my money back. There again, I wouldn't be happy about having to cancel a cruise either for any reason.
Vote Again
1:17 pm on Thursday, February 24, 2011
Recall is a waste of time at this point BUT please remember we have at least one of those "four fools" up for election in a year...that's were energy should be extended. Help re-elect the smart ones and send the other home! Remember we only need ONE vote to change!! If your board member got it right then work (of course you can't vote) on another election! This was crazy & I imagine others will run this time!!
Lisa56
6:25 pm on Thursday, February 24, 2011
My new bumper sticker will read "Anybody But Bartlett". Although I am still enjoying my "Cobb County School Board says: If it ain't broke, break it" bumper sticker. They've certainly proved that one over and over.
Vote Again
6:34 pm on Thursday, February 24, 2011
@lisa56. PLEASE tell me how we can get our hands on those!! I know a lot of people looking toward the Barlett elections for a little reminder on blowing off the masses! I hope this teaches a few people a lesson on the importance of school board elections...what is really needed is quality candidates. It is sad how few people (with any education background) actually run in these elections.
Vote Again
6:49 pm on Thursday, February 24, 2011
Another thing that REALLY chaps me is the awful people who have been leaving messages downplaying the wishes of the teachers! Who are these people & I hope they don't have kids @ my school because I want to believe we appreciate the hard work of our teachers. I frankly can't believe the salty comments made toward our Cobb teachers...people should be ashamed & the attitude of the board toward those teachers is CRAZY
Lisa56
12:37 am on Friday, February 25, 2011
I will look into the bumper sticker printing. We really need an organized effort to rid the county of the sort of mentality exhibited by the "Gang".
The negative comments about teachers is one of the main reasons there are discipline problems in today's classrooms unlike any of us saw when we were in school. If the parents show their disrespect for the efforts of their childrens' teachers that same disrespect will be displayed at school by their children. It must be an awesome to know everything about great teaching without ever having taught!
Pam J
7:50 pm on Thursday, February 24, 2011
Okay, let's try an experiment. Let's just pretend that the school board didn't change anything. Let's just say that they put three calendars out there and everybody could vote on which one they liked. Why would everybody like the balanced calendar better than the traditional? Remember, leave your hatred of the school board out of this right now. I just want to know what makes the balanced calendar better?
Vanessa
8:06 pm on Thursday, February 24, 2011
Balanced:
-allows down time for children- remember they wake up at 6:15 to be on the bus by 6:50 and get home at 2:45
-allows family to travel in the FALL when weather is cooler. Off season ( cheaper) rates for Feb.
-Allows for a break BEFORE Christmas- children get to enjoy the Holiday Season ( visit family, bake cookies, volunteer ( yes, we visit and bring cookies every year to nursing homes)
-allows High Schoolers to go to Driving School ( instead of overbooking their Saturdays)
- allows my child care cost to be spread out instead of the cash crunch for summer.
- allows us to travel for cub scouts-without taking the boys out of school
Pam J
8:17 pm on Thursday, February 24, 2011
Okay, that's good. Does the wake-up and school start time change with the other calendars? I truly don't know. I agree that the weeks you have off with the balanced calendar are good. But in the beginning everybody was complaining about finding child care for all that time off. That is what I didn't understand. If you had trouble finding someone to care for your child for three extra weeks off, why wouldn't you like the traditional calendar? I know why all of the teenagers like the balanced calendar, but the people with little kids do have more of an issue with the balanced calendar.
Lisa56
12:50 am on Friday, February 25, 2011
There ARE NOT three extra weeks off! The students are in school the same number of days using the balanced calendar as the traditional calendar. Had the balanced calendar been given the three years that were originally guaranteed there would have been some clever businesses that would have created wonderful weeklong camps just as those that exist during the long summer break. The high school students might make some extra money babysitting rather than having to work after school thus giving them more time to study. Ultimately, parents are responsible for finding appropriate activities for their children when school is not in session. As I have stated, my daughters are both teachers. They have spent the week catching up on the excessive paperwork that is required of all teachers and have had no "break" at all. I will guarantee that come Monday morning they will be ready to teach and their students will be ready to learn.
Pam J
10:46 am on Friday, February 25, 2011
Lisa, there are three extra weeks off with the balanced calendar. Because the kids would start on Aug. 1, that would help make up the extra days. A week in September, a week in February, and a week in April. Plus the weeks for Thanksgiving and Christmas. And, yes, I see that you love the balanced calendar.
Vote Again
8:50 pm on Thursday, February 24, 2011
I love the balanced calendar...it gives great breaks and my kids AND their teachers love it!!! Even if I didn't support it in the beginning (which I did) it seems funny that a SMALL minority feel it's ok to ask people to change plans or cancel vacations they've looked forward to (deposit or not) because some power hungry fools decided with TOTAL disregard for the majority of parents say we can't go! That schedule was posted, plans have been made and looked forward to with excitement so we will NOT cancel or call in sick! I will not ask mt children to lie & I will inform the school & whom ever else is necessary that my children will be on VACATION in Feb 2012!! It's the principal of the thing!
Lisa56
12:18 am on Friday, February 25, 2011
Might I suggest that each of us remind those who voted for the "traditional calendar" rather than the "balanced calendar" that they should enjoy their short-lived power play. Remind them of our disgust at their obvious disregard for the community they represent with weekly email updates to them. I would love for Ms. Angelucci and Company to continue to receive the numerous "jacked up" emails for the remainder of their one term school board tenure. If we can't recall them maybe we can just enjoy the little bit of karma we can send their way.
Kim
5:00 am on Friday, February 25, 2011
Another note for Cobb school advocates...PLEASE get out the vote for SPLOT! Unlike so many other taxes not spent so wisely, SPLOT projects are decided in advance & directly support schools & public areas!! In a time of so many budget cuts we will need this money going forward.
Pam J
11:07 am on Friday, February 25, 2011
We either approve the SPLOST or our property taxes goes up. It really is blackmail. And until we get our homestead exemption property tax deduction back, I can't afford for my property taxes to go up. But I didn't see anything about schools getting any help from the SPLOST.
Kim
11:20 am on Friday, February 25, 2011
@Pam...you are right, this is the SPLOST that is for parks and public works only. I beleive the one for schools has already been passed. Many great and necessary projects will be covered and I agree we certainly do not want a property tax increase!
Michael Jacobs
11:33 am on Friday, February 25, 2011
If you want to read what would be done by this proposed SPLOST, which does not cover schools, you can go to http://www.cobbsplost2011.org/. For an anti-SPLOST view, go to http://www.votenomarch15.com/. To read about the debate Wednesday, go to http://patch.com/A-ftqX. I hope to get a video from the debate posted in the next few days.
Kim
11:57 am on Friday, February 25, 2011
Yes, I forgot thois is not the one for schools, but instead public works! Still great projects for a penny!!
Lisa56
7:01 pm on Monday, February 28, 2011
Love this quote in the AJC today - from Lynn Cherry Grant, former Dekalb County School Board member 1992-2008 - "Never dismiss the power of politics. I learned that on the Board of Education."
Sadly, we have probably all learned that now.
Michael Stone
5:01 pm on Thursday, March 3, 2011
Powder Springs-Lithia Springs Patch's Moms Council opposes the calendar switch. What are your thoughts? Weigh in: http://patch.com/A-f3jq
Lisa56
1:34 am on Monday, March 7, 2011
I received an email on Sunday from Restore the Trust. A group dedicated to honesty and open dialogue between the citizens of Cobb County and the CCSD school board members. There is a cut and paste letter to be emailed to AdvanceED (SACS) by those who are concerned about the clandestine deals being made by the new board members and the chairman of the school board. Please visit the website: https://sites.google.com/site/restorethetrust/takeaction/actionitem1
to learn more.