To the Teachers

Teachers should consider voting yes for Amendment 1.

I know traditional public school teachers who will quietly vote yes on Amendment 1. For those who are considering voting no, I would like to offer some thoughts that you may or may not find compelling.

I understand the feeling that charter schools are not needed if you work in a high performing district. It is easy to stop at the thought that these children are doing well in a good system and you feel the comfort of an optimistic future. It is not the same in all school districts. Even though the state authorized charter schools form a tiny fraction of Georgia’s public school system, they are the most immediate hope for some parents in low performing systems or systems that have substituted cheating for teaching. Do you believe that limiting a parent’s choice to the 4-year election cycle empowers them in a meaningful way to help their child? Would you endure four years of your child languishing in a dysfunctional district? Consider these parents in the balance when you make your decision.

For the education bureaucrats, it is about power. Defeating Amendment 1 consolidates exclusive power within their domains. I believe ensuring state authority as a second authorizer is a balanced way of providing protection against the negative effects of absolute power. It ensures parental choice, promotes innovation, and sets up a natural comparison between state charter and traditional schools that encourage both to improve and to refine their priorities. It diffuses the potential for a radical pendulum swing that could lead to more disruptive reforms. The public charter school amendment is the most balanced and effective way to pursue improvement in Georgia’s schools.

Cherokee County School District teachers are enduring eight furlough days this year. There were no furlough days at Cherokee Charter Academy. It seems the first place the central office looks to cut spending is with the teacher. This serves the dual purposes of meeting budget and aligning the teachers’ interest with the administration. Have you ever heard an administrator threaten to cut central office spending to make their point? A lean system empowers the school principal and focuses money and energy in the classroom. State authorized charter schools bring renewed focus on the financial priorities of the local districts. This is good. Teachers should not be fodder in a bureaucratic fight. Renewed focus on financial priorities would make teachers the last item, not the first, to be cut.

Your vote is between you, God, and the voting machine. The public charter school amendment provides many benefits, tangible and not, to the parents, teachers, and children of Georgia. Amendment 1 is a threat to the bureaucrats, not to the teachers. Please consider these thoughts as you cast your vote.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Frank November 05, 2012 at 08:13 PM
Thomas: Nice apples and oranges comparison... No furlough days at CCA, yet they also are not required by law to provide transportation for their students. Here's a quote from the CCA website: "So that every resource is provided to education our parents are providing their own transportation." If the state fully funded the QBE formula, it's unlikely districts would need to schedule few, if any, furlough days. Should Amendment 1 pass, the state will fund state charter schools at roughly 1.5 times greater than local public schools thus further detracting from local school funds. State School Superintendent John Barge estimated that it will cost approximately $430 million over 5 years to fund state commission approved charter schools. We don't have the available funds without negatively impacting local school funding. Vote NO on Amendment 1
Thomas Hart November 06, 2012 at 03:26 AM
Frank, I was just submitting some thoughts for consideration for any teachers still deciding their vote. I didn't intend to elicit comment, but you do open some interesting points. QBE will apply to both public charter and traditional public schools. For charters approved by the state commission the state partially offsets the local taxes that do not follow the charter student with an additional allocation. The charter is still spending less per student. The local taxes remain with the traditional public school and actually improve their financial condition. Please read: http://www.georgiapolicy.org/do-charter-schools-hurt-students-in-traditional-schools/ Mr. Barge’s estimate assumes the state will approve 7 quality charter applications per year that have been denied by a local school board. Mr. Barge’s anticipation of a large number of rejected charter petitions is a true indicator of the hollowness of the “we support charters, but…” line the bureaucracy is so fond of. $430,000,000 over 5 years amounts to about 1.2% of the entire 2013 State Education budget ($7,170,000,000) for each or those 5 years. That money would be well spent with charters as they spend %60-%80 of what traditional public schools spend per student. Vote YES, it really does make cents.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »